2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical method for slope mass rating-Qslope correlation for Isfahan province, Iran

Abstract: The presented article provides an empirical method on rock slope classification, slope mass rating (SMR), Q slope , stability condition, failure type and stabilisation procedures for 35 road/railway discontinuous rock slopes after field surveys in Isfahan Province of Iran. Also, it presents the empirical correlation for SMR and Q slope classification system that prepares a link between the stability status (safety factor, reliability condition) and stabilisations (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For stability assessment, 25 cases are used for Q slope -based analysis. The required data is recorded during the field survey [ 13 , 14 ]. A relationship is given for multiple fault zones based on the Q slope classic method.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stability assessment, 25 cases are used for Q slope -based analysis. The required data is recorded during the field survey [ 13 , 14 ]. A relationship is given for multiple fault zones based on the Q slope classic method.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods facilitate the appropriate design and implementation of suitable support systems, enabling effective control of slope instabilities during their early stages [4]. Empirical relations have been recognized as robust solutions due to their swift analysis and minimal assumptions [5]. Leveraging the rapid quantification of rock slope features, empirical classifications facilitate prompt discussions and aid in the swift implementation of stabilization measures when slope failure is detected in its initial stages [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objectives of the stability analysis are the determination of rock slope stability conditions, study of potential failure mechanisms, determination of the factors that affect the slope stability, and performing the optimum and safe slope designs (Gurocak et al, 2017). Stability analysis and providing appropriate support systems for controlling the instabilities in the discontinuous rock slope is the main task for geo-engineers that were faced with different geotechnical projects (Azarafza, et al, 2020). Assessment of slope stability in such rock mass media is a very complex task, where the failures although can occur globally affecting few berms or the entire cut, most often have local character (plane failure, wedging, local toppling) (Janevski and Jovanovski, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical method Q-Slope utilizes parameters RQD (rock quality designation), Jn (joint set number), Jr (joint roughness number), Ja (joint alteration number), Jwice (environmental and geological condition number), SRF (stress reduction factor) and additional parameter O-factor (discontinuity orientation factor) based on the potential of failure (Barton and Bar, 2015). Q-Slope was used to both benefits, primarily as flexible empirical approaches to rock mass quantifications and investigate the various issues of the discontinuous to provide a suitable description in design applications (Azarafza, et al, 2020). Generally, application of the geomechanical classifications for primary slope stability assessment and suggesting the in-situ supporting system can be helpful to prevent the first-time rock failures in different excavation operations (Kumar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%