2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wf-iot.2014.6803162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical path loss model for wireless sensor network deployment in a sand terrain environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplicity of implementation and its ability to cover all environment-related factors that affect the propagation of the radio wave throughout actual measurements [6] introduces empirical path losses models over theoretical path loss models. The accurate wave propagation model for wireless sensor network are expected to support in achieving suitable valuation with improving of wireless sensors networks performance all over the deployment planning process, minimizing the power consumption of network end nodes and to enhance the localization and target sensing tasks [7].…”
Section: Empirical Rf Models In Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of implementation and its ability to cover all environment-related factors that affect the propagation of the radio wave throughout actual measurements [6] introduces empirical path losses models over theoretical path loss models. The accurate wave propagation model for wireless sensor network are expected to support in achieving suitable valuation with improving of wireless sensors networks performance all over the deployment planning process, minimizing the power consumption of network end nodes and to enhance the localization and target sensing tasks [7].…”
Section: Empirical Rf Models In Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related case, the authors in [23] present an empirical path loss model for wireless sensor network for sandy environment. They compare the model with that from sparse tree and long grass terrains.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors, such high PLE is due to the absence of LOS communication between the sending and receiving nodes. The authors continue their work in characterizing signal propagation in different environments by providing RF measurements and empirical path loss models for sand terrain environment in [12]. Surprisingly, the PLE turned out to be 3.42, which is higher than the PLE obtained in the sparse tree environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because different grounds have different properties, which govern the reflection of an incident wave. Previous studies have shown the inaccuracy of FSPL and Two-Ray models in predicting path loss for WSN deployed outdoors, for example, see [11,12,13]. In addition, the works in [11], [12], and [13] reported differences in RSS readings of WSNs deployed in different outdoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%