2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00084.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of Audit ‘Expectation Gap’ in The People's Republic of China

Abstract: The audit ‘expectation gap’ is a crucial issue associated with the independent auditing function and has significant implications on the development of auditing standards and practices. Through a questionnaire survey, this study investigated the rise of ‘expectation gap’ and related auditing issues under business and auditing environment in the People's Republic of China. The results reveal that the role and benefits of public accounting (independent auditing) had been positively recognized by Chinese audit be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To a large extent, the profession's refusal of performing the fraud detection duties had fueled the 'expectation gap. and confirms that the 'expectation gap' is an outcome of the contradiction of minimum government regulation and the profession's self-regulation, especially, the profession's over-protection of self-interest which has widened the 'expectation gap (Lin & Chen, 2004). …”
Section: Audit Expectations Gap:-supporting
confidence: 53%
“…To a large extent, the profession's refusal of performing the fraud detection duties had fueled the 'expectation gap. and confirms that the 'expectation gap' is an outcome of the contradiction of minimum government regulation and the profession's self-regulation, especially, the profession's over-protection of self-interest which has widened the 'expectation gap (Lin & Chen, 2004). …”
Section: Audit Expectations Gap:-supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The audit expectations gap centers on several issues, most notable among them are; the auditor"s roles and responsibilities as opined by Porter,(1993);Fazdly and Ahmad, (2004);and Dixon et al, (2006); the nature and meaning of audit report massages as opined by Monroe and Woodliff, (1994);and Gay et al, (1998); auditor"s independence as opined by Sweeney, (1997); Lin and Chen, (2004); Alleyne e al, (2005). Furthermore, Humphrey (1997) classified the issue on the audit expectations gap into four main areas: audit assurance, audit reporting, audit independence and audit regulation.…”
Section: Statement Of the Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers studied the existence of AEG and alternative methods to reduce the gap (McEnroe and Martes (2001), in England: Humphrey et al (1993), in Ireland: Robinson ve Lyttle (1991), in Australia: Monroe ve Woodliff (1993) and Schelluch (1996), in South Africa: Gloeck ve De Jager (1993), in Denmark: Hojskov (1998), in Netherlands: Hassink et al, (2009), in Singapore: Best et al (2001), in Malaysia: Fadzly ve Ahmad (2004), in China: Lin ve Chen (2004), in Egypt Dixon et al (2006), in Lebanon: Sidani (2007), in Saudi Arabia: Haniffa and Hudaib (2007)). …”
Section: Audit Expectations Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%