2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijmc.2012.048137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of consumer switching behaviour towards mobile shopping: a Push-Pull-Mooring model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption rates of mobile apps are becoming increasingly critical in the business realm due to ease-of-use, quick access to specialized content and engaging functionality (Jones, 2014).In addition to representing an opportunity for advertising and branding, apps hold potential as a mobile commerce channel (Taylor, Voelker & Pentina 2011). It empowers shoppers with the ability to gather information on the spot from multiple sources, check on product availability, special offers and alter their selection at any point along the path to purchase (Lai, Debbarma & Ulhas 2012). Thus, the consumer shopping modality is quickly and decisively changing from traditional shopping and PC-based online shopping to mobile shopping (Ali et al 2011;Butcher 2011) through various apps.…”
Section: Mobile Commerce and Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption rates of mobile apps are becoming increasingly critical in the business realm due to ease-of-use, quick access to specialized content and engaging functionality (Jones, 2014).In addition to representing an opportunity for advertising and branding, apps hold potential as a mobile commerce channel (Taylor, Voelker & Pentina 2011). It empowers shoppers with the ability to gather information on the spot from multiple sources, check on product availability, special offers and alter their selection at any point along the path to purchase (Lai, Debbarma & Ulhas 2012). Thus, the consumer shopping modality is quickly and decisively changing from traditional shopping and PC-based online shopping to mobile shopping (Ali et al 2011;Butcher 2011) through various apps.…”
Section: Mobile Commerce and Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study by Okazaki (2004) found that users are more receptive to pulled mobile communication because it is informative and entertaining, while pushing messages could be perceived as annoying. Similarly a mobile study by Lai et al (2012) points towards users favouring pulling techniques to become involved in mobile shopping. Since push mobile communication is still deemed evasive, unsolicited and even inclined to malicious advertising in some instances of free mobile applications, pulling mobile communication to patrons could be an acceptable alternative.…”
Section: Push Vs Pull Mobile Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou (2013) revealed that trust, flow, and perceived usefulness are estimators of mobile purchase intention and contextual offering has significant effects on trust, flow, and perceived usefulness. Lai et al (2012) found that initiators like trust, privacy, and security are significant determinants of starting to use mobile shopping. Kim and Kang (2001) have suggested that in terms of smart shopping, present over busy customers may look for hedonic benefits together with utilitarian aspects.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the antecedents of mobile shopping intentions defined a significant amount of its variance in our research model, but the other external factors that have not been involved in the model may assist to explain mobile shopping intentions. For instance, compatibility and anxiety (Lu and Su, 2009), trust, privacy (Lai et al 2012), risk and uncertainty (Siau et al, 2003) dimensions might better provide the comprehension of mobile shopping intentions from the viewpoint of flow dimension and other external variables. In accordance with these assessments, the results of the current study will be an inspiration to future studies and enable beneficial information for them.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%