2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.774480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of firm’s absorptive capacity dimensions, supplier involvement and new product development performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaborating with external partners is an effective mechanism for firms to identify and access the knowledge and information resources that exist in their partners (e.g. Luzzini et al, 2015;Najafi-Tavani et al, 2013;Winkelbach & Walter, 2015). Such collaborative innovation networks are particularly important in Iran given the international sanctions imposed over the last few decades that have forced local firms to rely more on their local actors to gain resources that they lack internally (seeZaefarian et al, 2017;Zaefarian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collaborating with external partners is an effective mechanism for firms to identify and access the knowledge and information resources that exist in their partners (e.g. Luzzini et al, 2015;Najafi-Tavani et al, 2013;Winkelbach & Walter, 2015). Such collaborative innovation networks are particularly important in Iran given the international sanctions imposed over the last few decades that have forced local firms to rely more on their local actors to gain resources that they lack internally (seeZaefarian et al, 2017;Zaefarian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an increasingly global and competitive business environment, firms have recognized the necessity of investing in new product development (NPD) to survive and gain competitive advantage (Gonzalez-Zapatero et al, 2016;Mu et al, 2017;Najafi-Tavani et al, 2013). NPD is, however, argued to be a resource intensive and expensive process associated with high risk (Liang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the proposed model introduces perceived risk shared as another performance dimension of collaboration process in CPD. Considering the appropriateness of the indicators used in recent related studies, this conceptual model adopts quality of design [24], [28], market acceptance [24], [29], time to market [16], [24], and financial performance [29] to evaluate the new product performance. In addition to the comprehensive performance evaluation criteria comprising collaboration process performance and new product performance, selecting meaningful constructs for the ICT usage would be necessary to ensure a holistic exploration of the effect of ICT on 'CPD performance'.…”
Section: Ict Usage and Its Effect On Cpd Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inman et al (2011) apply SEM to find the association between agile manufacturing and companies' performance in a JIT environment; and finally, Bortolotti, Danese, and Romano (2013) make use of SEM to determine the impact of JIT on operational performance. Najafi Tavani et al (2013) analyse its effects on the relationship between supplier involvement and new product development performance; Gawankar, Kamble, and Verma (2013) investigate the relationships between supply chain management practices and organisations. Additionally, Jakhar and Barua (forthcoming) develop a comprehensive evaluation tool and decision model, which can help the practitioners to gauge their supply chain performance and guide them in decision-making for further improvements; and Kim, Suresh and, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer (2013) investigate the impact of manufacturing flexibility and the technological dimensions of manufacturing strategy on responsiveness in the supply chain.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modelling and Its Use In The Modelling Omentioning
confidence: 99%