2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00004.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of Operational Performance Parity Following Enterprise System Deployment

Abstract: T his paper presents an empirical.inv.estigatio~ into whether the implementation of packaged ~nte.r prise Systems (ES) leads to panty In operational performance. Performance change and panty In operational performance are investigated in three geographically defined operating regions of a single firm. Order lead time, the elapsed time between receipt of an order and shipment to a customer, is used as a measure of operational performance. A single ES installation was deployed across all regions of the subject f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The firms which only use the basic ERP are typically underperform. This our finding is contradict to other international studies that have found positive abnormal stock returns for firms using ERP also found evidence of improved financial performance immediately after ERP implementation (Stratman, 2007;Hitt, Wu & Zhou 2002;McAfee, 2002;Cotteleer, 2006). The presented empirical findings can partially be related to research on the effectiveness of ERP implementation process that shows that the ERP absorption level is achieved with significantly less efficiency and effectiveness in transition economies (Bernroider et al, 2011;Rajnoha et al, 2014), and with difficulties resulting from organizational conditions, including problems with training and consultants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The firms which only use the basic ERP are typically underperform. This our finding is contradict to other international studies that have found positive abnormal stock returns for firms using ERP also found evidence of improved financial performance immediately after ERP implementation (Stratman, 2007;Hitt, Wu & Zhou 2002;McAfee, 2002;Cotteleer, 2006). The presented empirical findings can partially be related to research on the effectiveness of ERP implementation process that shows that the ERP absorption level is achieved with significantly less efficiency and effectiveness in transition economies (Bernroider et al, 2011;Rajnoha et al, 2014), and with difficulties resulting from organizational conditions, including problems with training and consultants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Survey data from North American manufacturing firms that have implemented ERP systems demonstrate that ERP adopters seeking operational performance improvements are likely to realize these benefits (Stratman, 2007). Also other international research studies have found clear improvements in operational metrics as a result of ERP implementation (McAfee, 2002;Cotteleer, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also contribute to the supply chain management literature by extending previous research in the context of ERP and CRM technologies (Cotteleer 2006;McAfee 2002;Stratman 2007;Tsikriktsis, Lanzolla, and Frohlich 2004) to the RFID context. While previous SCM research recognizes that information technologies foster information sharing and reduce costs (Johnson and Whang 2002;Kopczak and Johnson 2003), this paper helps to explain how other factors within the firm (e.g., RFID implementation spending) and external to the firm (e.g., partner mandate) facilitate business value through RFID technology.…”
Section: Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, longitudinal firm‐level research has shown improvements in operational performance (McAfee, 2002; Cotteleer and Bendoly, 2006) and productivity (Hitt et al , 2002) can result from the adoption of ERP. Recently Cotteleer (2006) observed that although ERP systems are widespread, they are not always fully deployed. The benefits accrued may represent an early‐mover advantage rather than a sustainable competitive advantage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%