Abstract:In this research, we examine empirically the impact of sustainable supply chain practices on financial performances, considering the case of Indian firms. Here, we use a sample of 25 Indian firms listed for their sustainability performances in the Thomson Reuters Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores. The sustainability performance data have been accessed from the Bloomberg terminal, where the overall sustainability performance on ESG is measured as a discounted score on ESG considering various con… Show more
“…These values are substantially higher than those reported by similar past studies. For example, Sachin and Rajesh (2021) examine the impact of ESG score on ROA and ROE using path analysis and find R 2 values ranging from 0.25 to 0.70. Using a linear regression model to examine the impact of ESG score on Tobin’s Q for 356 European companies, Nirino et al (2021) find an R 2 value of 0.38.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, prior studies on the relationship between ESG ratings and financial performance provide mixed evidence. Sachin and Rajesh (2021) examine whether implementing ESG practices would help firms achieve financial benefits [return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE)] and competitive advantage. The authors fail to find any significant connection between Bloomberg’s ESG ratings and financial performance and conclude that benefits from ESG ratings do not occur in the short-term.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of sustainability disclosures and disclosure ratings on firm value. This paper compares the informativeness of sustainability disclosures in company reports versus environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure ratings. The authors examine the extent to which they provide incremental information.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample consists of panel data from over 2,600 publicly-listed non-financial US companies for the period 2014–2018. The authors obtain sustainability disclosures from Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Navigator and ESG disclosure scores from Bloomberg. The authors regress market value and/or stock price on sustainability disclosures and ESG scores to evaluate information content.
Findings
ESG scores are positively associated with market value and price. Sustainability disclosures in the form of metrics and company-tailored narratives provide incremental information content on market value and/or price. Boilerplate disclosures reduce market value and price. Sustainability disclosures and ESG scores provide incremental information, suggesting that it would be beneficial to harmonize standards for reporting sustainability disclosures.
Research limitations/implications
The limitation is that the authors have only considered sustainability disclosures for a sample of US companies from two sources – SASB Navigator and Bloomberg.
Practical implications
The paper provides some evidence that may be pertinent to the debate on whether to harmonize the guidance on reporting sustainability issues.
Social implications
The paper provides evidence on the benefits to firms for reporting sustainability issues.
Originality/value
This paper is among the first to analyze company sustainability disclosures obtained from two different sources – SASB Navigator and ESG disclosure ratings – and compare them for relevance for company valuation. With SASB Navigator, the authors obtain further refinement into the nature of the information provided in the sustainability disclosures, that is, boilerplate, company-tailored or metrics disclosures.
“…These values are substantially higher than those reported by similar past studies. For example, Sachin and Rajesh (2021) examine the impact of ESG score on ROA and ROE using path analysis and find R 2 values ranging from 0.25 to 0.70. Using a linear regression model to examine the impact of ESG score on Tobin’s Q for 356 European companies, Nirino et al (2021) find an R 2 value of 0.38.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, prior studies on the relationship between ESG ratings and financial performance provide mixed evidence. Sachin and Rajesh (2021) examine whether implementing ESG practices would help firms achieve financial benefits [return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE)] and competitive advantage. The authors fail to find any significant connection between Bloomberg’s ESG ratings and financial performance and conclude that benefits from ESG ratings do not occur in the short-term.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of sustainability disclosures and disclosure ratings on firm value. This paper compares the informativeness of sustainability disclosures in company reports versus environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure ratings. The authors examine the extent to which they provide incremental information.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample consists of panel data from over 2,600 publicly-listed non-financial US companies for the period 2014–2018. The authors obtain sustainability disclosures from Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Navigator and ESG disclosure scores from Bloomberg. The authors regress market value and/or stock price on sustainability disclosures and ESG scores to evaluate information content.
Findings
ESG scores are positively associated with market value and price. Sustainability disclosures in the form of metrics and company-tailored narratives provide incremental information content on market value and/or price. Boilerplate disclosures reduce market value and price. Sustainability disclosures and ESG scores provide incremental information, suggesting that it would be beneficial to harmonize standards for reporting sustainability disclosures.
Research limitations/implications
The limitation is that the authors have only considered sustainability disclosures for a sample of US companies from two sources – SASB Navigator and Bloomberg.
Practical implications
The paper provides some evidence that may be pertinent to the debate on whether to harmonize the guidance on reporting sustainability issues.
Social implications
The paper provides evidence on the benefits to firms for reporting sustainability issues.
Originality/value
This paper is among the first to analyze company sustainability disclosures obtained from two different sources – SASB Navigator and ESG disclosure ratings – and compare them for relevance for company valuation. With SASB Navigator, the authors obtain further refinement into the nature of the information provided in the sustainability disclosures, that is, boilerplate, company-tailored or metrics disclosures.
Section: The Long-term Impact Of Esg Fulfillment On Roamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the relationship between ESG responsible investment and financial performance has been the focus of debate in academia. A series of research results found that ESG responsible investment can improve financial performance, and there is a significant positive correlation between the two [1][2][3], while some studies shows that ESG responsible investment will deteriorate financial performance, and there is a negative correlation between the two [4,5], ESG responsible investment will not have a positive impact on the company's financial performance within five years [6]. Some scholars believe that the relationship between ESG responsible investment and financial performance is vague, contradictory, and uncertain [7][8][9], ESG varies greatly among different industry sectors and different financial variables [10].…”
Focusing on the 311 Chinese firms listed in the global markets from 2008 to 2019, based on the trade-off theory and the resource slack theory, using panel vector autoregressive model and panel threshold model, this paper explores the impact of fulfilling ESG responsibility on firm performance. The study reveals that in the short run, fulfilling ESG responsibility presents a “Substitution Effect,” whereas, in the long run, it presents a “Promotional Effect.” On the other hand, the improvement of firm performance has a significantly positive impact on ESG fulfillment investment, even though there is a strong hysteresis effect. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding the relationship between ESG fulfillment and firm performance. ESG fulfillment has a negative impact on firm performance in the short run, with the most affected firms being those small and mid-sized firms listed in the Mainland China markets. In the near term, the impact of firm performance on ESG fulfillment is positive, with those listed in the overseas markets and large firms being affected the most. The study reveals that firm size and the factors affiliated with ESG fulfillment tend to cause the differentiation effect in the inhibitory influence of ESG fulfillment on firm performance in the short run. This study could be used as a guideline for the social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations.
“…Most studies on ESG scores have so far focused on developed countries, such as the U.S. and other advanced countries in Europe [14,15]. Studies that concentrate on emerging markets are still limited [16][17][18]. Emerging markets such as China are still in the early stages of economic development.…”
A plethora of present studies has the purpose of analyzing the connection related to the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on business performance. However, it has still not been able to bring out comprehensive results because of using a single metric to measure performance. Due to that, this research will: (i) use the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to measure transportation firms’ performance and (ii) use OLS regression to explore the relationship between ESG combined score and business performance. In the first stage, we found out that 43 out of 56 firms work inefficiently. The managers of those companies should utilize their resources and refer to the benchmarking as a sample to follow. The environmental and social scores positively affect business performance in the second stage. Thus, managers should consider ESG as an investment, primarily when transportation is categorized as an “environmentally sensitive industry”. Besides, investors should pay more attention to a company that has ESG activities because that firm has the chance to improve its business performance and deal with its commitments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.