2013
DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2013.12090352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of the Efficacy of Mixed-Use Development: The Seattle Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many residents, especially those of suburban areas in the USA, see mixed land uses as a threat to their communities (Kotkin, 2010). While many have argued that mixed development is capable of addressing city sustainability by reconciling environmental, social and economic dimensions, DeLisle and Grissom (2013) opined that mixed development may pose a threat to city sustainability goals. Furthermore, while mixed development may reduce the housing deficit, it may also accidentally emphasise the socio-spatial inequality resulting from occupational polarisation if the planning is not supported by appropriate affordable housing policies (Moos et al , 2018).…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many residents, especially those of suburban areas in the USA, see mixed land uses as a threat to their communities (Kotkin, 2010). While many have argued that mixed development is capable of addressing city sustainability by reconciling environmental, social and economic dimensions, DeLisle and Grissom (2013) opined that mixed development may pose a threat to city sustainability goals. Furthermore, while mixed development may reduce the housing deficit, it may also accidentally emphasise the socio-spatial inequality resulting from occupational polarisation if the planning is not supported by appropriate affordable housing policies (Moos et al , 2018).…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in spite of these constraints, mixed development is generally seen as an important instrument in urban planning for city development and growth and that its benefits exceed its constraints are largely taken for granted. Therefore, like in many countries like The Netherlands (Hoppenbrouwer and Louw, 2005), the UK (Rowley, 1996), Canada (Moos et al , 2018), the USA (DeLisle and Grissom, 2013), China (Kong et al , 2015), Singapore, Australia, Thailand and Hong Kong, the demand for residential building in mixed development in Malaysia is increasing unabated. In fact, the supply of mixed development is a major part of the national policy on city development and revitalisation.…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difficulty to operate empirical studies on mixeduse development value is attributed to the ambiguity of the data, e.g. the heterogeneity of different projects, ambiguous classification for multi-phase projects and ambiguous classification for some vertical mixed-use buildings where only the ground floor is for retail use (DeLisle & Grissom, 2013). Capozza and Li (1994) discussed the one-time land conversion option from one use to another.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such multifaceted programs can promote social equity and inclusiveness by offering a variety of housing options to people with a wide range of economic abilities. These potential social benefits of bringing a diverse range of amenities and services together can lead to enhanced safety and increased movement independence, especially for socially disadvantaged groups [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%