DOI: 10.22215/etd/2007-06476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of the relationships among strategy, flexibility, and performance in the supply chain context : a path analysis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(298 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach was taken in Agostini and Nosella (2019), who measured the level of adoption of industry 4.0 technologies (including Additive Manufacturing). Also, two auxiliary question (Chou et al, 2017) 21 items affecting postponement flexibility, production flexibility, and sourcing flexibility (Fantazy, 2007;Fantazy et al, 2009;Liao, 2008;Sanchez and Perez, 2005), one of the most frequently used SCF dimensions in previous papers (Manders et al, 2017); and 27 items affecting supplier-oriented performance, customer-oriented performance, cost-containment performance, time-based performance, and reliability performance (Banomyong and Supatn, 2011;Baofeng, 2012;Beamon, 1999;Lee et al, 2007;Li et al, 2006;Liao et al, 2010), selected SCP dimensions (Table 2). The measures for SCF and SCP constructs are based on self-reported data, as the nature of the research instrument used assumes anonymity to respondents (Jobber, and O`Reilly, 1996).…”
Section: Survey Design and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach was taken in Agostini and Nosella (2019), who measured the level of adoption of industry 4.0 technologies (including Additive Manufacturing). Also, two auxiliary question (Chou et al, 2017) 21 items affecting postponement flexibility, production flexibility, and sourcing flexibility (Fantazy, 2007;Fantazy et al, 2009;Liao, 2008;Sanchez and Perez, 2005), one of the most frequently used SCF dimensions in previous papers (Manders et al, 2017); and 27 items affecting supplier-oriented performance, customer-oriented performance, cost-containment performance, time-based performance, and reliability performance (Banomyong and Supatn, 2011;Baofeng, 2012;Beamon, 1999;Lee et al, 2007;Li et al, 2006;Liao et al, 2010), selected SCP dimensions (Table 2). The measures for SCF and SCP constructs are based on self-reported data, as the nature of the research instrument used assumes anonymity to respondents (Jobber, and O`Reilly, 1996).…”
Section: Survey Design and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible for the members of the supply chain to adopt a more passive strategy that involves simply following in the path of other competitors. Fantazy (2007) studied 175 SMEs manufacturers across 18 competitive strategic priorities and revealed three main supply chain strategy types, which the authors labelled Innovative strategy (INS), Customer-oriented strategy (COS), and Follower (FOS) strategy. The INS tends to be the earliest to enter the new market or adopt the new technology to achieve its competitive advantage.…”
Section: Supply Chain Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FOS usually follows other firms' examples and usually focuses on tight cost control to achieve low cost production. This research study employs the classification proposed by Fantazy (2007) for two reasons. First, reviewing supply chain literature, this is the only proposed framework empirically developed for the supply chain context.…”
Section: Supply Chain Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there were any problems, we would make follow-ups immediately at the point of pickup. Out of the 600 invitations, we collected 241 valid questionnaires, with a response rate of 40.17%, which was considered satisfactory given the previous experience with B2B surveys of a similar nature (Fantazy, Kumar, & Kumar, 2009;Liao et al, 2010;Wang & Wei, 2007;Zhang et al, 2005). 1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%