2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of the complexity and randomness of prediction error sequences

Joel Ratsaby
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former case, if we take the upper bound (7.2) on the deviation to be a measure of non-randomness of the system's output sequence and view the number of states 2 k as the complexity of the FSM (which is based on model M k ), then it follows that the larger the complexity the less random the output. This is evident in numerical simulations [17] (Section 6.3). Also, the output becomes less random if the mismatch k − k * between the system's model order and the environment's Markov order grows or if the environment's Markov order k * increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the former case, if we take the upper bound (7.2) on the deviation to be a measure of non-randomness of the system's output sequence and view the number of states 2 k as the complexity of the FSM (which is based on model M k ), then it follows that the larger the complexity the less random the output. This is evident in numerical simulations [17] (Section 6.3). Also, the output becomes less random if the mismatch k − k * between the system's model order and the environment's Markov order grows or if the environment's Markov order k * increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In order to measure how nonrandom the output sequence may be, we compare the deviation between the average number of 1 bit in the output versus the probability of a symbol 1. Empirical investigations of such matching systems [17,18] show that subsequences that are selected by them have empirical frequencies that deviate from the probabilities in proportion to the complexity of the system's FSM. The current paper confirms this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure of complexity was shown to directly effect the algorithmic complexity and level of randomness of the learner's mistake sequence. Ratsaby [9] investigated a population of binary mistake sequences that result from such a learning process. Estimates of the algorithmic complexity and stochastic divergence of the mistake sequences were obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%