An Empirical Study of the NETCONF Protocol

Yu, James; Ajarmeh, Imad Al

doi:10.1109/icns.2010.41

Cited by 21 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is therefore still a need to improve SDN by considering distributed architectures [68], [69]. It may also be important for TSPs, InPs and ETSI to consider other possible solutions such as NETCONF [70].…”

Section: B Software Defined Networking (Sdn)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges

Mijumbi

Serrat

Gorricho

et al. 2016

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

1,610

773

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Network Function Virtualization (NFV) has drawn significant attention from both industry and academia as an important shift in telecommunication service provisioning. By decoupling Network Functions (NFs) from the physical devices on which they run, NFV has the potential to lead to significant reductions in Operating Expenses (OPEX) and Capital Expenses (CAPEX) and facilitate the deployment of new services with increased agility and faster time-to-value. The NFV paradigm is still in its infancy and there is a large spectrum of opportunities for the research community to develop new architectures, systems and applications, and to evaluate alternatives and trade-offs in developing technologies for its successful deployment. In this paper, after discussing NFV and its relationship with complementary fields of Software Defined Networking (SDN) and cloud computing, we survey the state-of-the-art in NFV, and identify promising research directions in this area. We also overview key NFV projects, standardization efforts, early implementations, use cases and commercial products.

show abstract

Section: B Software Defined Networking (Sdn)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges

Mijumbi

Serrat

Gorricho

et al. 2016

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

1,610

773

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[40,42] Centralized model Multi core scheduler is used to record reusable decisions 6TiSCH [42,43] Centralized model 6TiSCH and DetNet is used for Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) DMCQR [43,44] Centralized model Multi-constrained QoS resource allocation model Kim et al [44,45] Centralized model Network QoS control framework for converged fabrics Maestro [45,46] Distributed Model Simple programming model with additional throughput optimisation technique Procera [46,47] Distributed model A control architecture for software-defined networking (SDN) using a declarative policy language Hyperflow [47,48] Distributed model An event-based control plane Onix [48,49] Distributed model A platform for distributed system Devolved [49,50] Distributed Model Use of multiple independent controllers Kandoo [50,51] Distributed model Two-layer controller architecture Fig. 1 Traditional network architecture vs. three-layered software-defined networking architecture SDN controller works with the four interfaces: Northbound [56], Southbound [57], Eastbound [58] and Westbound [59] interfaces.…”

Section: Components Of Sdnmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Efficiency in Software Defined Networking: A Survey

Rout¹,

Sahoo

Patra

et al. 2021

SN COMPUT. SCI.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software defined networking has solved many challenging issues in the field of networking industry. It separates the control plane from the data forwarding plane. This makes SDN to be more powerful than traditional networking. However, energy cost enhances the overall network cost. Therefore, this issue needs to be addressed to improve design requirements and boost the networking performance. In this article, several energy efficiency techniques have been discussed. To represent it in more detail, a thematic taxonomy of energy efficiency techniques in SDN is given by considering several technical studies of the past research. These studies have been categorized into three sub categories of traffic aware model, end-host aware model and finally rule placement. These models are provided with detailed objective functions, parameters, constraints and detailed information. Furthermore, useful visions of each approach, its advantages and disadvantages and compressive analysis of energy efficiency techniques are also discussed. Finally, the paper is highlighted with the future directions for energy efficiency in SDN.

show abstract

“…NETCONF had efficiency, effectiveness, and security advantages when compared to the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), a popular network management protocol, especially when managing complex and diverse network environments (J. Yu & Al Ajarmeh, 2010). SNMP and NETCONF are both useful management tools that can be used in parallel on hybrid switches that support programmable networking.…”

Section: Other Pre-sdn Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-domain Software Defined Networking: Research status and challenges

Wibowo

Gregory

Ahmed

et al. 2017

Journal of Network and Computer Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A key focus of the transition to next generation computer networking is to improve management of network services thereby enhancing traffic control and flows while simplifying higher-level functionality. Software-defined networking (SDN) is an approach that is being developed to facilitate next generation computer networking by decoupling the traffic control system from the underlying traffic transmission system. SDN offers programmability in network services by separating the control plane from the data plane within network devices and providing programmability for network services. Enhanced connectivity services across the global digital network require a multi-domain capability. This paper presents a review of the current research status in SDN and multi-domain SDN, focusing on OpenFlow protocol, and its future related challenges.

show abstract

An Empirical Study of the NETCONF Protocol

Cited by 21 publications

References 1 publication

Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges

Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges

Energy Efficiency in Software Defined Networking: A Survey

Multi-domain Software Defined Networking: Research status and challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About