An Empirical Study on the Benefits Equity of the Medical Security Policy: the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS)

Abstract

Background: One of the fundamental objectives of the basic medical security system is to provide institutional guarantees for the appropriate medical needs of different groups. Among them, achieving fairness of benefits is the first principle of the system. This study aims to explore the benefit equity of preventive health care for different groups and the specific path to promote fairness. Methods: Based on the 2015 CHNS survey data, through the theory construction of benefit fairness in the basic medical insurance and using the two-stage IV-Heckman model, the paper analyzes the benefit fairness of the basic medical insurance in urban and rural China. Results: This study indicates that (1) the results of empirical and theoretical models are not consistent with the sample of the insured population. (2) As private medical insurance and medical assistance are restricted in the model, the reimbursement ratio of medical insurance in other income groups is all higher than the highest one. However, the coefficient is getting larger, with the lowest income group having the largest coefficient. After controlling for variables of disease and severity, the results suggest that the main impact path is hospitalization costs. (3) Taking the highest income group as a reference, the compensation proportion of preventive health care in other groups is higher, respectively, than the reference group, while the groups below middle income have a significant relationship with compensation for preventive health care. Conclusions: Supplementary private medical insurance and medical assistance have important protection functions for low- and middle-income populations. However, owing to the actual income threshold, the two groups cannot benefit from the medical security system. This result is still valid in the field of preventive health care. The increase of preventive health care expenditure reduces the cost of individual hospitalization, but the high-income group has emerged with more preventive health care expenditures, creating new unfairness.

Outpatient Visits among Older Adults Living Alone in China: Does Health Insurance and City of Residence Matter?

“…This result is in line with a Canadian study that showed that area variation is the most important source of income-related health inequality, with income-related inequities in outpatient visits being mostly driven by differences between cities [48]. The cities in eastern and central regions have better health spatial accessibility, while in the western regions there is more limited spatial accessibility [49]. Moreover, this imbalance in outpatient visits can also be explained by different levels of medical resources and health insurance policies in different cities of residence [40].…”

Inpatients’ Perception of Patient-Centered Care in Guangdong Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study

“… 38 Nevertheless, compared to urban patients, lower overall PCC scores indicated that rural inpatients have greater dissatisfaction with medical services. Second, compared to the medical insurance schemes for urban patients, in recent years, the Chinese government has increased the reimbursement rate for patients who are covered by the NCMS 39 ; thus, rural residents’ disease burden has been significantly reduced. 40 This key development strategy has greatly improved rural patients’ expectations, as stated by most participants in our study, who reported that they can access medical services more conveniently and at affordable rates.…”

Inequality in benefit distribution of reducing the outpatient cost-sharing: evidence from the outpatient pooling scheme in China

“…Pan et al (11) also found that lower-income groups benefited less than higher-income groups in China's URBMI program (11). Liu and Dai (2020) observed that compared to the highest-income group, below-middle-income groups had significantly insufficient compensation in China's basic medical insurance system (18). However, some gaps remain in existing studies.…”