An Empirical Test of Capital Structure Theories for the Vietnamese Listed Firms

Abstract

Raising capital efficiently for the operations is considered a fundamental decision for any firms. Since the 1960s, various theories on capital structure have been developed. Various empirical studies had also been conducted to examine the appropriateness of these theories in different markets. Unfortunately, evidence is mixed. In the context of Vietnam, a rising powerful economy in the Asia Pacific region, this important issue has been largely ignored. This paper is conducted to provide additional evidence on this important issue. In addition, different factors affecting the capital structure decisions from the Vietnamese listed firms are examined. The Generalized Method of Moment approach is employed on the sample of 227 listed firms in Ho Chi Minh City stock exchange over the period from 2008 to 2017. Findings from this study suggest that the Vietnamese listed firms follow the trade-off theory to determine their capital structure (i.e., to determine the optimal debt level). In contrast, no evidence has been found to confirm that the pecking order theory can explain the financing decisions of the Vietnamese listed firms, as previously expected. In addition, findings from this study also indicate that ‘Fund flow deficit’ and ‘Change in sales’ are the most two important factors that affect the amount of debt issued for the Vietnamese listed firms. Implications for academics, practitioners, and the Vietnamese government have also been emerged from the findings of this paper.

Leverage structure decisions in Bangladesh: managers and investors’ view

“…Kopecky et al (2018) utilized an alternative capital structure policy which was deviant from the Modigliani and Miller (1958) and Miller (1988) theorem for the prediction of borrowing funds that reinstates the irrelevance of the capital structure. The Trade-Off Theory: An investigation on the use of the capital structure theories in 227 Vietnamese listed firms indicated that the trade-off theory was adopted to explain their implemented financial decisions (Nguyen et al, 2019). According to Bajaj et al (2020), a total of 183 research papers were analyzed on the capital structure theories in developing countries, but a lack of primary research still exists.…”

Non-Mutually Exclusive Trade-off and Pecking Order Theories: A Study in Indonesia

“…The internal funding deficit will be financed using a source of funds derived from retained earnings to decrease debt. It is reinforced by the research results of Byoun and Rhim (2003) and Nguyen, Ho, & Vo (2019). A hypothesis could be formulated based on these descriptions, as follows.…”

Factors Affecting Small and Medium Enterprises’ Financial Sustainability in South Africa

“…Abdullazade (2019) indicated that firms prefer to use debt financing to fix small financing issues but resort to equity financing for large deficits. The Pecking Order Theory explains the capital structure decision and financing behaviour of firms (Nguyen, Ho, and Vo, 2019). Since most SMEs are challenged with securing funds (access to finances) and skills to managing those funds (financial awareness, accounting skills and budgeting skills) to ensure SME's financial stability, it is significant to look at factors that guarantee access to funds as well as factors affecting the effective management of these funds.…”