2009
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.7647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enabler for supplier discovery in virtual supply chains :

Abstract: Rigid supply-chain organizational structures are giving way to highly dynamic collaborative partnerships. These partnerships will develop rapidly by composing global manufacturing resources in response to open market opportunities; and, they will disband just as rapidly when those opportunities disappear. One critical element of these virtual networks is the supplier discovery, i.e., the ability of customers to find suppliers that have the capabilities to meet their requirements. This initial report explores t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the second type of contribution, the following approaches were found for matching supply chain stakeholders' capabilities with buyers' requirements stored in a centralized data source: semantic reconciliation approaches to find matches [29]- [34], [38]- [41], [43], ontologies to structure information [29]- [34], [38]- [41], [43], [44], and semantic clustering of supply chain stakeholders' capabilities in a classification tree to classify and retrieve capabilities [42]. As part of the second type of contributions, the report by Fenves et al [37] from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) highlights the need for a taxonomy to share a common terminology among supply chain stakeholders to support supply chain stakeholder identification.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second type of contribution, the following approaches were found for matching supply chain stakeholders' capabilities with buyers' requirements stored in a centralized data source: semantic reconciliation approaches to find matches [29]- [34], [38]- [41], [43], ontologies to structure information [29]- [34], [38]- [41], [43], [44], and semantic clustering of supply chain stakeholders' capabilities in a classification tree to classify and retrieve capabilities [42]. As part of the second type of contributions, the report by Fenves et al [37] from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) highlights the need for a taxonomy to share a common terminology among supply chain stakeholders to support supply chain stakeholder identification.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…즉, 모든 공급망 참여 기업을 대상으로 웹서비 스를 이용하여 기업 상태 및 정보를 수집함으로써 공급망 전 체에 대한 동적인 시뮬레이션 수행이 가능해 졌다 (Yoo et al, 2009 (Chi, 2010;Im et al, 2011;Ameri and Patil, 2010 (Javalgi et al, 2009) 더불어, 과거의 일회적인 제품 생산이나 노동력 확보를 위한 아웃소싱과 달리, 최근에는 KPO(Knowledge Process Outsourcing) 라고 불리는 고부가 서비스에 대한 아웃소싱이 급증하고 있는 추세이다 (Javalgi et al, 2009). (Fenves et al, 2009) ALIBABA.com의 핵심기능은 다양한 거래지원 도구 서비스 를 제공하는 것이다 (Guo et al, 2006 (Im et al, 2011). et al, 2006).…”
Section: 김경덕․조보람․신문수․류광열․조현보unclassified