1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(75)73678-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An end point for pneumatic dilation of achalasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the 5‐min time‐point in that study was based on the observation that most healthy individuals have emptied their esophagus by 1 min, and all by 5 min. Complete emptying at 5 min at TBE has been used thus as a criterion for an adequate treatment result in achalasia 2,19 . We were unable to confirm the absolute reliability of that criterion in our study as one of 13 patients with normalized emptying at 5 min failed treatment during follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The choice of the 5‐min time‐point in that study was based on the observation that most healthy individuals have emptied their esophagus by 1 min, and all by 5 min. Complete emptying at 5 min at TBE has been used thus as a criterion for an adequate treatment result in achalasia 2,19 . We were unable to confirm the absolute reliability of that criterion in our study as one of 13 patients with normalized emptying at 5 min failed treatment during follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Good to excellent symptom relief has been reported in 50–90% of cases 13 . In general, subjective improvement is poorly correlated with the degree of objective and physiological improvement 14–17 . By this approach, progress of disease will remain unnoticed and the ultimate goal of therapy will not be achieved 10, 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other technique that was used for objective evaluation of these patients after pneumatic dilation was barium swallow. The results of initial work were conflicting, because the barium studies were not standardized and patient's improvement were assessed by symptom scores 4, 14, 18, 21 . To solve this problem, de Oliveira et al 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the usefulness of the radiographic evaluation of the pneumatically dilated esophagus in predicting the clinical response of patients with achalasia has not been well-documented [5][6][7][8]. We have analyzed the radiographic appearances in 16 patients immediately following pneumatic dilatation of the esophagus for achalasia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%