1965
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.33.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Energetics of Quasar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
213
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was noted in [8] with reference to the class of models of [12,13], but the effect can be ascribed, in general, to the larger values attained by the slow-roll parameter ǫ in the relevant region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was noted in [8] with reference to the class of models of [12,13], but the effect can be ascribed, in general, to the larger values attained by the slow-roll parameter ǫ in the relevant region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand (see fig. 1), in the orientifold vacua [11] of String Theory with "Brane Supersymmetry Breaking" (BSB) [12,13] pre-inflationary peaks can lie well apart from the limiting profile, an option that appears favored by low CMB multipoles [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is possible that an analysis analogous to ours would reveal that naked singularities appearing in Ref. [23] are also resolved by turning on a small positive brane cosmological constant. We hope to investigate some of these issues in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These tadpoles are not eliminated by the magnetic deformation, and typically result in potentials that, although of run-away type for the dilaton, can in some cases stabilise some geometric moduli [15]. Their presence requires a background redefinition [33], that was recently constructed explicitly in [34] for the model in [35]. In general, these vacua correspond to supergravity models frozen in phases of broken supersymmetry, where the presence of (lower-dimensional) non-supersymmetric couplings renders the field equations naively inconsistent, in complete analogy with ordinary gauge theories frozen in a Higgs phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%