An Energy Efficient Routing for Emergency Rescue in IoT-Based WSN

Shreyas, J.; Shilpa, S.; K, Udayaprasad P; Srinidhi, N. N.; Kumar, S. M. Dilip

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5037-7_23

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To accomplish these objectives, a mechanism for prioritizing urgent data was created. Shreyas et al [12] proposed the En-ergy Efficient Emergency Response System (EEER). During emergencies, the suggested EEER efficiently and quickly distributes crucial data.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

PrioriNet

M.,

Prasanna G.

2024

Int. j. electr. comput. eng. syst. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During disaster scenarios, effective communication systems are essential for coordinating emergency response efforts and ensuring the safety of affected individuals. However, existing communication protocols often face challenges in providing reliable and efficient communication in these highly dynamic and resource-constrained environments. To overcome these challenges a novel energy-efficient emergency priority protocol namely PrioriNet technique which specifically tailored for urban earthquake scenarios. The protocol focuses on prioritizing the transmission of emergency data packets to ensure their prompt and reliable delivery, while appropriately managing normal data packets. The PrioriNet prioritizes the emergency messages as high and low priority messages and allocate them to energy efficient nodes efficiently. The experimental results indicates that the suggested protocol performs better than the existing LEACH technique in terms of energy consumption, network coverage, packet delivery ratio, and throughput. In emergency data scenarios, the LEACH protocol demonstrates throughputs between 0.3 Mbps and 1.2 Mbps, whereas the proposed method consistently outperforms the LEACH protocol with throughputs ranging from 0.7 Mbps to 1.8 Mbps respectively.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%