2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An energy-stable generalized-α method for the Swift–Hohenberg equation

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights • We present a second-order energy-stab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30]). Several numerical methods have been developed to alleviate the time step restriction while still keeping the energy dissipation, related contributions include the fully implicit operator splitting finite difference method [6,5], the semi-analytical Fourier spectral method [18], the unconditionally energy stable method [12] derived from an integration quadrature formula, the large time-stepping method [32] based on the use of an extra artificial stabilized term, and the energy stable generalized-α method [24]. However, these methods generally require the use of an iteration in solving the fully discrete nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30]). Several numerical methods have been developed to alleviate the time step restriction while still keeping the energy dissipation, related contributions include the fully implicit operator splitting finite difference method [6,5], the semi-analytical Fourier spectral method [18], the unconditionally energy stable method [12] derived from an integration quadrature formula, the large time-stepping method [32] based on the use of an extra artificial stabilized term, and the energy stable generalized-α method [24]. However, these methods generally require the use of an iteration in solving the fully discrete nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, the phase-field or orderparameter varies smoothly (i.e., continuously) over these thin layers, with a key point being that the energy of these models needs to be dissipated as time progresses. The existence of a Lyapunov functional for these diffuseinterface problems implies strong energy stability [60], a property which can be lost if inadequate algorithms and/or spatio-temporal resolutions are used to solve the partial differential equation [24,48,55,60]. This work addresses the nonlinear stability issue for both conserved and non-conserved phase-field variables, and presents a simple process that relies on Taylor series to handle the nonlinear terms present in the partial differential equation.…”
Section: Energy Stability Of Phase-field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discretize the model problem using PetIGA [4], a high-performance isogeometric analysis solver built on PETSc (portable extensible toolkit for scientific computation) [60]. PetIGA has been utilized in many scientific and engineering applications (see, e.g., [10,11,16,20,21,23,25,26,[61][62][63][64]). It allows us to investigate both IGA and rIGA discretizations on test cases with different numbers of elements in 2D and 3D, different polynomial degrees of the B-spline spaces, and different partitioning levels of the mesh.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%