An Engineering Method to Measure the Bank Productivity Effect in Malaysia during 2001-2008

Deng, Qiang; Wong, Wai P.; Wooi, Hooy Chee; Xiong, Cui Ming

doi:10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.002

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This literature review confirms this opinion, since most of the articles that compare banks with foreign and domestic ownership have declared that foreign-owned banks are more efficient than domestic banks (Assaf et al, 2013;Bayyurt, 2013;Berger et al, 2009;Chiu et al (2013), Chiu et al (2016), Deng et al, 2011;Doan, 2017;Dong, 2016;Fujii, 2014;Gardener et al, 2011;Hsiao et al, 2015;Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al, 2009a;Lee and Kim, 2013;Lin et al, 2016;Mamatzakis et al, 2008;Sokic, 2015;Staikouras et al, 2008;Wanke et al, 2016c). Assaf (2013) stated that the highest efficiency change and productivity change scores are achieved by the foreign banks in Turkey through a focus on nonperforming loans (NPLs).…”

Section: Ownership Effect On Efficiencysupporting

confidence: 56%

“…Bayyurt (2013) reached the same result with Assaf (2013) that average financial efficiencies of foreign banks in Turkey are higher than that of domestic banks. In Malaysia, foreign banks were found to be more efficient than domestic private commercial banks on average (Deng et al, 2011). Another study focusing on five Southeast Asian countries, including Malaysia, supports this finding by stating that foreign banks are superior in both technical and cost efficiency (Gardener et al, 2011 explored bank efficiencies in 12 Asian countries (including Turkey and Malaysia) and found that the presence of foreign banks improves bank efficiency levels primarily in countries with financial freedom.…”

Section: Ownership Effect On Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Ahmad et al (2011),Alqahtani et al (2017),Andries (2011),Assaf et al (2011),Barros et al (2011),Batir et al (2017),Bayyurt (2013),Belanes et al (2015),Casu and Girardone (2010),Chan et al (2015),Chen et al (2013),Chen et al (2017),Chiu et al (2013),Chiu et al (2016), Chotareas et al (2012& 2013,Curi et al (2015),Daly and Frikha (2015),Deng et al (2011), Dong et al (2014,Drake et al (2009), Fernandes et al (2017), Fujii et al (2014,Fukuyama and Matousek (2017),Gardener et al (2011), Hisham Tahya et al (2012,Huang et al (2017aHuang et al ( & 2017b,Isık et al (2016),Ismail et al (2013),Ivan (2015),Johnes et al (2014), Jose et al (2014,Kao and Liu (2014),Kaur and Gupta (2015),Kenjegalieva (2009),Kevork et al (2017), Kılıç (2011),Kumar and Gulati (2009), Mobarek (2014), Olson and Zoubi (2011), Paradi et al (2011), Perea and Skully(2012), Puri and Yadav (2014), Quaranta et al (2017), Ray and Das (2010), Repkova (2014), Rosman et al (2014), Salim et al (2016), Staub et al (2010), Sufian et al (2016), Svitalkova (2014), Thoraneenitiyan and Avkiran (2009), Titko and Jureviciene (2013), Ulas and Keskin (2015), Wang et al (2015), Yılmaz and Güneş (2015), Zha (2016) and Zimkova (2014). SFA Abdul-Majid et al (2017), Alqahtani et al (2017), Andries (2011), Andries and Capraru (2012), Burki and Ahmad (2010), Chitnis and Vaidya (2017), Doan et al (2017), Dong et al (2014 & 2016), Goddard (2014), Hardianto and Wulandari (2016), Hsiao et al (2015), Huang et al (2017a,b & c), Ivan (2015), Jiang et al (2009 & 2013), Koutsomanoli-Filippaki (2009a), Lensink rt al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sahi̇pli̇k, Yöntem Ve Banka Ti̇pi̇ Ne Ölçüde Önemli̇di̇r? Karşilaştirmali Banka Performansi Ve Etki̇nli̇ği̇ Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Li̇teratür Araştirmasi

Sarı

2019

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluating the performance of banks is crucial due to its strong and positive relationship with financial growth and stability. The study presents a contemporary review of the literature on bank efficiency and performance. The purpose of the study is to analyze, compare and classify the comparative studies on bank efficiency and performance by ownership structures, countries of origin, bank types and quantitative methods used in the analyses. For this purpose, 135 comparative studies encompassing the period 2008-2017 from over 30 countries are analyzed. The study introduces the application of various mathematical techniques including multi-criteria decision making methods in bank efficiency measurement. Then the relationship between ownership and bank efficiency is analyzed. Finally comparison of Islamic banking with conventional banking in terms of efficiency and performance is discussed.

show abstract

Section: Ownership Effect On Efficiencysupporting

confidence: 56%

Section: Ownership Effect On Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 89%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sahi̇pli̇k, Yöntem Ve Banka Ti̇pi̇ Ne Ölçüde Önemli̇di̇r? Karşilaştirmali Banka Performansi Ve Etki̇nli̇ği̇ Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Li̇teratür Araştirmasi

Sarı

2019

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Efficiency gains (catch-up) were obtained through cost reduction and technical innovation was associated with greater diversification of revenue away from interest earnings. Deng et al (2011) This study used two outputs loans and advances, and profit, and three inputs branches, staff, and deposits. The study found that the average TFP change is 1.4%, which is mainly due to the efficiency change of 3.3%.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks, 2004 – 2010

Alrafadi

Kamaruddin²,

Yusuf

2015

International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a comparative analysis regarding the performance of 17 Libyan banks over the period 2004 up to 2010. According to the relevant literature, there are few studies that measure both technical efficiency and Malmquist productivity index approach using non -parametric approach (DEA) for the banking sector in Libya. For this study, the DEA technique was used to estimate technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency of sampled banks by using DEAP software. . The results showed that the specialized banks have exhibited higher mean technical efficiency relative to commercial and private banks. This paper concludes with some policy implications of the results. The results for total factor productivity (TFP) showed 11 of 17 Libyan banks decline because TFP levels of banks drawn by negative technical efficiency change (less than 1) or by negative technological change, or both of them are negative.

show abstract

“…The MPI, introduced by Malmquist [48], evaluates total factor productivity (TFP) growth and is used in the current study to quantify the SEA Islamic banks' productivity growth. The MPI can be measured using several approaches, for example; DEA and translog index [25]. Besides, MPI is a technique which generally depends on DEA that evaluates the change in productivity over a fixed value either increase or decrease in between two periods [15].…”

Section: The Malmquist Productivity Index (Mpi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficiency of Islamic Banks in the Southeast Asia (SEA) Region

Chowdhury

Haron

2021

Futur Bus J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Islamic banking sector has become a crucial part of the global banking industry. Despite the Islamic banking industry’s encouraging growth in the Southeast Asia (SEA) region, prior studies mostly focused on Islamic banks’ efficiency in the individual country. To fill the literature gap, this study aims to measure the efficiency and productivity growth of Islamic banks in the SEA region. This study adopted the DEA technique and the Malmquist productivity index to evaluate 31 Islamic banks’ performance in SEA from 2014 to 2019. The results evidenced an improvement in efficiency and progress in productivity for the banks in the region. The findings documented better efficiency and gradual progress in productivity for Islamic banks in Indonesia, consistent efficiency for Malaysia, a significant improvement for Brunei; hence, both Thailand and the Philippines Islamic bank depicted a drop-in efficiency for 2019. The findings trigger bank managers to acknowledge the inefficiencies and their sources. Investors and policymakers may find the findings useful in observing the banks’ performance; thus, taking effective mechanism and policies to promote competent and sustainable SEA Islamic banks in the long run.

show abstract

An Engineering Method to Measure the Bank Productivity Effect in Malaysia during 2001-2008

Cited by 7 publications

References 21 publications

Sahi̇pli̇k, Yöntem Ve Banka Ti̇pi̇ Ne Ölçüde Önemli̇di̇r? Karşilaştirmali Banka Performansi Ve Etki̇nli̇ği̇ Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Li̇teratür Araştirmasi

Sahi̇pli̇k, Yöntem Ve Banka Ti̇pi̇ Ne Ölçüde Önemli̇di̇r? Karşilaştirmali Banka Performansi Ve Etki̇nli̇ği̇ Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Li̇teratür Araştirmasi

The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks, 2004 – 2010

The efficiency of Islamic Banks in the Southeast Asia (SEA) Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About