2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enhanced eBook facilitates parent–child talk during shared reading by families of low socioeconomic status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size in this particular study was, though, quite small (n = 25 in each group, and only two were experienced Kindle users). Nevertheless, similar claims concerning format effects on the reading experience and/or on the recollection of what has been read have also been made by a number of other researchers over the years (e.g., see Ackerman and Goldsmith, 2011;Delgado et al, 2018;Dell'Antonia, 2011;Grothaus, 2019;Halamis and Elbaz, 2019;Hou et al, 2017;Mangen et al, 2013;Parish-Morris et al, 2013;Roseberry et al, 2009;Singer and Alexander, 2017;Troseth et al, 2020;Wolf, 2018;Woody et al, 2010; though see also Köpper, Mayr and Buchner, 2016). Although there is not space to discuss these studies in detail here, in general, there would appear to be some agreement for a modest, albeit nuanced, influence of reading format on various outcome measures (see also Walsh, 2016, for a review).…”
Section: Do Physical Books Really Convey Information Better Than the supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The sample size in this particular study was, though, quite small (n = 25 in each group, and only two were experienced Kindle users). Nevertheless, similar claims concerning format effects on the reading experience and/or on the recollection of what has been read have also been made by a number of other researchers over the years (e.g., see Ackerman and Goldsmith, 2011;Delgado et al, 2018;Dell'Antonia, 2011;Grothaus, 2019;Halamis and Elbaz, 2019;Hou et al, 2017;Mangen et al, 2013;Parish-Morris et al, 2013;Roseberry et al, 2009;Singer and Alexander, 2017;Troseth et al, 2020;Wolf, 2018;Woody et al, 2010; though see also Köpper, Mayr and Buchner, 2016). Although there is not space to discuss these studies in detail here, in general, there would appear to be some agreement for a modest, albeit nuanced, influence of reading format on various outcome measures (see also Walsh, 2016, for a review).…”
Section: Do Physical Books Really Convey Information Better Than the supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Although there are likely multiple mechanisms for these effects, in the domain of book reading, one contributing factor appears to be that the one-on-one context allows an adult to tailor reading to a particular child's level of understanding, allowing children to learn at their own pace (Connor and Morrison, 2016). While dialogic reading is a relatively simple practice Blom-Hoffman et al, 2008), there is wide variability in the extent to which parents use these practices when reading with children (Hindman et al, 2014;Troseth et al, 2019) and not all environments and family situations allow for the one-on-one interaction that is at the core of dialogic reading. Parents who are traveling or live apart from children may not be present for book reading on a daily or even weekly basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many digital books come with highly interactive features that engage the child to actively respond to the book through touch, voiceover and other attentiondemanding techniques (Sari et al, 2019). These interactive features are very rarely designed to include a co-reader, adult or peer (Troseth et al, 2020). Rather, personalized digital books are designed to offer automatic 'You are here' tags, automatic feedback loops, progressively adapted to the child's reading progress in the book.…”
Section: Example 2: Subjective/objective Space Boundaries With Sharedmentioning
confidence: 99%