2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An entropic simulational study of the spin-1 Baxter–Wu model in a crystal field

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect a similar study for p ≥ 3 p-spin model would also result in new ordered states and rich phase diagram. A study of the model on a triangular lattice to look for the possibility of multiple transitions in finite dimensions would also be interesting [17][18][19]. and q in terms of m and H via Eq.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We expect a similar study for p ≥ 3 p-spin model would also result in new ordered states and rich phase diagram. A study of the model on a triangular lattice to look for the possibility of multiple transitions in finite dimensions would also be interesting [17][18][19]. and q in terms of m and H via Eq.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r and ∆ are the bias of the distribution and the strength of the random-crystal field respectively. The r = 0 and 1 corresponds to the dilute BW model for p = 3 [16][17][18][19]. We consider ∆ > 0 and 0 ≤ r ≤ 1 throughout this paper.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure1: (a) Phase diagram of the 2D spin-1 Baxter-Wu model with the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases separated by a continuous transition for larger T (solid line) and a firstorder transition for smaller T (dotted line). The line segments meet at the pentacritical point (∆ pp , T pp ) ≈ (0.8902, 1.4)[6] marked by the black rhombus, where three ferrimagnetic configurations and a ferromagnetic configuration, along with that of zero spins coexist[6,7,8]. The dashed arrow at T = 2.1 indicates the temperature choice of our simulations that corresponds to ∆ ≈ −3.5, see also figure2(a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where E 1 and E 2 are, respectively E 1 = ij σ i σ j and E 2 = ij σ i σ j cos nφ ij [28]. Hence, the thermodynamic averages can be obtained for any value of the parameters T , J, and J a [24,29]. For these cases we used the lattice sizes L = 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 e 40.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%