An Environmental Life Cycle Approach to Design

Abstract

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Quantitative sustainable design (QSD) for the prioritization of research, development, and deployment of technologies: a tutorial and review

“…Additionally, all relevant approaches require the system inventory be compiled from the foreground system to execute the inventory analysis, and converting the system inventory to the life cycle inventory (LCI) by considering impacts incurred in the background. 54 For example, in operating a membrane reactor, the system inventory could include a specified number of membrane, while the LCI would include all mass and energy flows associated with these membrane modules across their life cycle. 46…”

Resilient and Sustainability Analysis of Flexible Supporting Structure of Expansive Soil Slope

“…Four environmental impact types were selected, Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), and Abiotic Depletion Potential Fossil (ADP fossil), which were used to characterize, standardize, and normalize the data. According to the method in literature [32], the comprehensive environmental indicators of flexible and rigid support structures per unit area (1000 m 2 ) were obtained (Table 2) and the relative proportion comparison diagram (see Figure 17). As can be seen from Table 2, for the flexible support structure, the life cycle environment comprehensive index value is 3.56 × 10 −10 .…”

Safe Sink Tectonics: Towards a Metabolism of the Built Environment Within Planetary Capacities

“…Is reality a social construction (nature included) (Castree 2013) or should all aspects of realty be included in the social realm and constructed to a scientific ( what Harman would designate as overmining versus undermining (Harman 2018))? If we answer no to both of these questions, a particular kind of ontological positioning should permit us to approach reality in its hybrid constellations.…”