2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07599-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An environmentally friendly strategy for determining organic ultraviolet filters in seawater using liquid-phase microextraction with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mijangos et al (2018) optimized a polyethersulfone microextraction for 22 PhaCs and 2 preservatives in estuarine samples [110] while Dias et al (2021) developed a extraction method for antibiotic enrofloxacin using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction assisted with sonication (UA-DLLME) [100], both with satisfactory results (recoveries over 70%). Some of them are based on liquid extraction such as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [111][112][113], liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [114] or ultrasound assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME) [118] while other microextraction techniques are based on the adsorption of the contaminants on a device that could be a bar such as stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) or bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) [116,117], or a fabric device as using fabric phase sorptive extraction (FPSE) [119]. It is important to highlight that most of these microextraction techniques are based on equilibrium processes and for this reason the recoveries are not as high as using exhaustive extraction methodologies such as SPE.…”
Section: Extraction From Coastal Liquid Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mijangos et al (2018) optimized a polyethersulfone microextraction for 22 PhaCs and 2 preservatives in estuarine samples [110] while Dias et al (2021) developed a extraction method for antibiotic enrofloxacin using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction assisted with sonication (UA-DLLME) [100], both with satisfactory results (recoveries over 70%). Some of them are based on liquid extraction such as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [111][112][113], liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [114] or ultrasound assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME) [118] while other microextraction techniques are based on the adsorption of the contaminants on a device that could be a bar such as stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) or bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) [116,117], or a fabric device as using fabric phase sorptive extraction (FPSE) [119]. It is important to highlight that most of these microextraction techniques are based on equilibrium processes and for this reason the recoveries are not as high as using exhaustive extraction methodologies such as SPE.…”
Section: Extraction From Coastal Liquid Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%