2000
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2000.36174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epidemiological study of the spread of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus amongst previously non-exposed rabbit populations in the North Island of New Zealand

Abstract: Rabbit haemorrhagic disease reduced rabbit numbers on the majority of farms where the virus was released, and appears to be an effective measure for controlling rabbit populations in New Zealand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where they were carefully monitored, these seem to have been generally successful (Sanson et al 2000). Rabbit populations were reduced by about 50% within 6 weeks of release, although results were variable (range 0-77%).…”
Section: Initial Impact Of Rhdmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Where they were carefully monitored, these seem to have been generally successful (Sanson et al 2000). Rabbit populations were reduced by about 50% within 6 weeks of release, although results were variable (range 0-77%).…”
Section: Initial Impact Of Rhdmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The virulent one is the most spectacular (due to its high lethality) and is the most often found in the field. The avirulent strain has been rarely isolated (Capucci et al, 1996), but its presence is suspected in many field studies (Chasey et al, 1995;Cooke et al, 2000;Marchandeau and BoucrautBaralon, 1999;Marchandeau et al, 1998;Rodak et al, 1990;Sanson et al, 2000;Trout et al, 1997). This can be explained by a likely sampling bias, since rabbit populations have been mostly sampled after an outbreak of RHD mortality.…”
Section: A Virus Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RHDV strains isolated in the field are generally highly lethal (up to 95% mortality 2 days post-infection) and transmissible, but interestingly the impact of the virus has been highly contrasted. Some populations have a high proportion of seropositive rabbits in the absence of recorded mass mortality due to the m a n u s c r i p t 5 disease (Chasey et al, 1995;Cooke et al, 2000;Marchandeau and Boucraut-Baralon, 1999;Marchandeau et al, 1998;Rodak et al, 1990;Sanson et al, 2000;Trout et al, 1997),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) was introduced illegally into New Zealand in 1997 (Thompson & Clark, 1997). The virus causes peracute disease and high rates of mortality in rabbits, and is used as a biological control tool for wild rabbit populations (Sanson et al ., 2000; Parkes et al ., 2002). The effectiveness of the disease in reducing pest rabbit populations appears to be highly variable, and epidemics generally occur intermittently at annual or bi‐annual intervals (Parkes et al ., 2002; Henning et al ., 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%