2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.033
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Equilibrium Model for the Combined Effect of Macromolecular Crowding and Surface Adsorption on the Formation of Linear Protein Fibrils

Abstract: The formation of linear protein fibrils has previously been shown to be enhanced by volume exclusion or crowding in the presence of a high concentration of chemically inert protein or polymer, and by adsorption to membrane surfaces. An equilibrium mesoscopic model for the combined effect of both crowding and adsorption upon the fibrillation of a dilute tracer protein is presented. The model exhibits behavior that differs qualitatively from that observed in the presence of crowding or adsorption alone. The mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the positional variability of folding kinetics and equilibrium of a mutant of phosphoglycerokinase fused to green and red fluorescent proteins in intact U2OS (mammalian) cells is clearly non-random (Figures 3A,B), and appears to correlate with supramolecular structures such as membranes or cytoskeletal fibers within the cell 55 . This could indicate that the in-cell behavior of a probe molecule may be influenced by its interaction with surfaces as much as by crowding in the bulk medium, as has been suggested previously 6, 8, 66, 67 .…”
Section: What Have We Learned From “In Vivo” Experiments?supporting
confidence: 53%
“…For example, the positional variability of folding kinetics and equilibrium of a mutant of phosphoglycerokinase fused to green and red fluorescent proteins in intact U2OS (mammalian) cells is clearly non-random (Figures 3A,B), and appears to correlate with supramolecular structures such as membranes or cytoskeletal fibers within the cell 55 . This could indicate that the in-cell behavior of a probe molecule may be influenced by its interaction with surfaces as much as by crowding in the bulk medium, as has been suggested previously 6, 8, 66, 67 .…”
Section: What Have We Learned From “In Vivo” Experiments?supporting
confidence: 53%
“…1D, 2C, 3C and 4B). Upon increasing the crowding agent concentration up to 300-400 mg/ml, however, no change in amyloid aggregation mechanisms with a short lag phase was observed (not shown), unlike in the presence of alcohols or salts, probably because of the well-documented enhancement of surfacecatalyzed protein fibril formation in the presence of macromolecular crowders 42 .…”
Section: Addition Of Macromolecular Crowders Also Accelerates αS Nuclmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent investigations probing the effects of crowding on protein aggregation have mainly focused on using molecular simulation to explicitly sample the interactions between proteins and crowders in 3D, [40][41][42] and on using kinetic massaction kinetics models for computing the changes to the cluster size distributions as a function of time. 23,35,36,[43][44][45] For example, Magno et al 40 used a simplified Lennard-Jones potential to quantify the interactions between the proteins and the crowders, and Langevin dynamics simulations to sample aggregation trajectories. They found that the crowders stabilized oligomers, and increased the solution viscosity.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of the Effects Of Molecular Crowding Onmentioning
confidence: 99%