2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0219025709003665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ergodic Theorem for Quantum Diagonal Measures

Abstract: We extend the Nonconventional Ergodic Theorem for generic measures by Furstenberg, to several situations of interest arising from quantum dynamical systems. We deal with the diagonal state canonically associated to the product state (i.e. quantum "diagonal measures"), or to convex combinations of diagonal measures for non ergodic cases. For the sake of completeness, we treat also the Nonconventional Ergodic Theorem for compact dynamical systems, that is when the unitary generating the dynamics in the GNS repre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a state ϕ on a noncommutative algebra M, however, the straightforward definition via ϕ ∆ (a⊗ b) := ϕ(a·b) for all a, b ∈ M fails to be positive in general. A workaround to deal with this issue was proposed by R. Duvenhage [Duv08] and F. Fidaleo [Fid09]. In the following we repeat this construction and derive some elementary properties.…”
Section: Coupling Of Quantum States and Diagonal Statesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For a state ϕ on a noncommutative algebra M, however, the straightforward definition via ϕ ∆ (a⊗ b) := ϕ(a·b) for all a, b ∈ M fails to be positive in general. A workaround to deal with this issue was proposed by R. Duvenhage [Duv08] and F. Fidaleo [Fid09]. In the following we repeat this construction and derive some elementary properties.…”
Section: Coupling Of Quantum States and Diagonal Statesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The modular conjugation J associated to µ (and to ζ) is then obtained as the conjugate linear operator J : H → H given by J(e p ⊗ e q ) = e q ⊗ e p for all p, q = 1, 2, 3, .... Furthermore, (33) j(π(a)) := Jπ(a) * J = π ′ (a T ) for all a ∈ B(H), where a T denotes the transpose of a in the basis e 1 , e 2 , e 3 , .... This allows us to apply the general notions from the earlier sections explicitly to this specific case.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 and Theorem 4.2 of Ref. 9. Indeed, let (A, α, ω) be a C * -dynamical system based on the unital C * -algebra A, the automorphism α, and the invariant state ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%