2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An error analysis of a finite element method for a system of nonlinear advection–diffusion–reaction equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all those works, error estimates were established under certain time-step conditions. Moreover, linearized semi-implicit schemes have also been analyzed with certain time-step restrictions for many other nonlinear parabolic-type systems, such as Navier-Stokes equations [1,21,23,26,27], nonlinear thermistor problems [14,44], viscoelastic fluid flow [9,15,41], KdV equations [30], nonlinear Schrödinger equation [34,38] and some other equations [2,22,35]. A key issue in analysis of FEMs is the boundedness of the numerical solution in L ∞ norm or a stronger norm, which in a routine way can be estimated by the mathematical induction with an inverse inequality, such as,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all those works, error estimates were established under certain time-step conditions. Moreover, linearized semi-implicit schemes have also been analyzed with certain time-step restrictions for many other nonlinear parabolic-type systems, such as Navier-Stokes equations [1,21,23,26,27], nonlinear thermistor problems [14,44], viscoelastic fluid flow [9,15,41], KdV equations [30], nonlinear Schrödinger equation [34,38] and some other equations [2,22,35]. A key issue in analysis of FEMs is the boundedness of the numerical solution in L ∞ norm or a stronger norm, which in a routine way can be estimated by the mathematical induction with an inverse inequality, such as,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the example given in [22]. We take 1.287428e −5 9.125372e −4 3.569207e −5 1.602872e −2 Table 5.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each time step, to enhance the accuracy of our numerical solution, we solve the discrete linear system (5.1) by using an iteration method. In Algorithm 1, the iteration procedure is detailed in steps (2.2)-(2.3), and the advantages in its implementation is described in [22]. Algorithm 1 :…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars investigated Eq. (1.1) for example using an improved finite element approach [2], meshless local approaches [3,4], lattice Boltzmann technique [5], a front-tracking method [6], novel WENO methods [7], or a finite element method [8]. The interested readers can refer to [9,10] to get more information for Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%