2014
DOI: 10.1080/00049182.2014.953731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Eruv for St Ives? Religion, identity, place and conflict on the Sydney north shore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allowing a minority identity into the public space carried the risk of turning the cultural majority of St Ives into the new ‘dispossessed’ and ‘oppressed’ (Cooper, 1996, p. 535). At the same time, by presenting the eruv as a ghetto, concentrations of some groups are rendered problematic, while the concentration of other groups is normalised and legitimised (Connell and Iveson, 2014, p. 436).…”
Section: Unpacking Amenitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allowing a minority identity into the public space carried the risk of turning the cultural majority of St Ives into the new ‘dispossessed’ and ‘oppressed’ (Cooper, 1996, p. 535). At the same time, by presenting the eruv as a ghetto, concentrations of some groups are rendered problematic, while the concentration of other groups is normalised and legitimised (Connell and Iveson, 2014, p. 436).…”
Section: Unpacking Amenitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 For a geographical analysis of the St Ives case focusing on space and place and covering events until 2012, see Connell and Iveson (2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%