2020
DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS)-based nomogram for predicting major morbidity in patients with esophageal carcinoma

Abstract: Background: Performing an esophagectomy for a malignancy presents an operation with an elevated risk of complications. The esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS) has been confirmed to be a strong predictor of major postoperative morbidity. The purpose of this study was to construct and establish an eSAS-based nomogram for predicting major morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.Methods: A total of 194 patients underwent radical esophagectomy for the malignant disease was analyzed by internal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increased blood loss causes intravascular volume depletion and leads to a lower blood pressure and a higher HR. Furthermore, the intraoperative MAP and HR are greatly affected by anaesthesia management, such as the anaesthetic depth, fluid volume control and use of vasoactive agents, as well as the patient’s physical background [ 17 ]. Indeed, Regenbogen et al [ 4 ] compared the prognostic value of SAS before and after adjusting for a detailed risk-prediction model and concluded that the SAS is a useful indicator of the surgical quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased blood loss causes intravascular volume depletion and leads to a lower blood pressure and a higher HR. Furthermore, the intraoperative MAP and HR are greatly affected by anaesthesia management, such as the anaesthetic depth, fluid volume control and use of vasoactive agents, as well as the patient’s physical background [ 17 ]. Indeed, Regenbogen et al [ 4 ] compared the prognostic value of SAS before and after adjusting for a detailed risk-prediction model and concluded that the SAS is a useful indicator of the surgical quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PS was derived from models including age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, hemoglobin, CRP, albumin, urinary protein, Brinkman Index, height-adjusted total kidney volume measured on CT, type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pharyngo-laryngoesophagectomy, comorbidities and medications as listed in Table 1 . These clinical variables used to create the propensity score were selected from the factors that have been reported as risk factors for postoperative complications and AKI [ 3 5 , 10 , 11 ]. Further adjustments for time-averaged eGFR, albumin levels, body weight ratio, and CRP were performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transthoracic esophagectomy is highly invasive, and complications, such as anastomotic leakage and postoperative pneumonia, frequently occur [ 2 ]. Risk factors for postoperative complications include older age, malnutrition, anemia, obesity, and underlying diseases such as cardiac disease and diabetes mellitus [ 3 5 ]. Postoperative complications prolong hospital stays, impair patients’ activities of daily living [ 6 ], and lead to poorer prognosis [ 7 – 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the value of the SAS in EC remains obscure and disputable. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the mathematical relationship between the esophageal surgical Apgar score (eSAS) and postoperative morbidity or prognosis 22,23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%