2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance

Abstract: Invariance of factor loadings across studied groups is required for valid comparisons of scale score or latent variable means. Strong and strict invariance may be less important in the context of basic research in which group differences in specific factors are indicative of individual differences that are important for scientific exploration. However, for most applications in which the aim is to ensure fairness and equity, strict factorial invariance is required. Health disparities research often focuses on s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
557
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 584 publications
(568 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
557
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…were evaluated (e.g., Meredith & Teresi, 2006). Tests of invariance evaluate whether the item-to-factor relationships are consistent across groups or assessments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were evaluated (e.g., Meredith & Teresi, 2006). Tests of invariance evaluate whether the item-to-factor relationships are consistent across groups or assessments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in combined analyses of two groups measured by a test that does not exhibit metric invariance across these groups, differences in factor loadings can result in the appearance of additional non-substantive factors (Meredith and Teresi 2006). This has the potential to confuse attempts to identify the dimensionality of autistic traits and any putative correlates of identified dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, any aggregated factor analyses of scores of those with and without ASD in which scalar invariance does not hold can result in additional factors appearing due to the differences in thresholds across the groups (Meredith and Teresi 2006). Again, where the dimensionality of ASD traits may be of interest, this could produce misleading results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural and measurement residuals were not invariant. Requiring structural and measurement residuals to be equal across groups is a strict level of invariance (Meredith & Teresi, 2006). Thus, for the purposes of this research study, the calibration and validation samples are considered to demonstrate acceptable levels of invariance.…”
Section: Calibration/validation Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%