An Estimation of the Effect of Green Financial Policies and Constraints on Agriculture Investment: Evidences of Sustainable Development Achievement in Northwest China

Abstract

Farming' community actively participating as micro-actors in green finance schemes is critical for regional planning and development. On the basis of the extent to which financial progress and sustainable development are coordinated, in a difference-in-differences approach, this article employed 2350 small investigations to estimate the influence of green-finance strategies on peasants' agriculture investment and developed a mediation effect method. It investigates the role of peasant managerial variability in mediating the influence of financial constraints. The results indicate that the introduction of a financial restriction variable reduces the positive impacts of green-finance regulations on peasants' agricultural investment. Moreover, peasants who participate in non-agricultural management exercises are more inclined to take advantage of green financing regulations and are affected via financial restrictions in mediate means. The building of a green-finance sector in remote regions should accomplish unique positioning and rapid growth.

Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development

“…Mei et al (2020) conducted a sample survey to examine the constraining role of finance in agricultural green development. The research revealed that finance had a certain degree of inhibition on agricultural green development, necessitating financial reform to alleviate its inhibitory effects on agricultural green development [41].…”

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Agriculture Green Development in Beijing’s Ecological Conservation Developing Areas from 2006 to 2016

“…In our study, the regional limiting factors of AGD, analyzed by the obstacle degree model, could be neglected in larger-scale evaluations, which often cover spatial differences and individual problems. Based on a literature review, the factors influencing AGD can be categorized into economic, political, technological, and other factors [22,86]. The main limiting factor influencing the AGD level in Beijing ECDA was AP7, with the exception of 2009 (Table 2).…”

“…The smaller the gap between the levels of economic development, the more favorable it is to increase the total green factors in agriculture [33,34]. The impact of regional finance on agricultural green total factor productivity in China has also proved that agricultural investment flows are needed in the agricultural sector [86,87]. Rani et al [88] and Lei et al [89] stated that the misallocation of agricultural capital affects the efficiency of agricultural green production as well.…”

Agricultural credit scale and agricultural green production efficiency: a Metafrontier-Malmquist-Luenberger and panel Tobit approach

“…Many agricultural credit funds have been used to improve agricultural production technology, ignoring the improvement of agricultural technology efficiency, resulting in the uneven allocation of agricultural credit funds (Wen and Wang, 2022). On the other hand, the expansion of the agricultural credit scale is divorced from the actual needs of agricultural business entities, and there are situations where agricultural business entities divert credit funds for other purposes, resulting in more overdue loans, affecting the enthusiasm of financial institutions to provide credit funds in agriculture (Mei et al, 2022). Thirdly, the agricultural credit scale significantly impacts the AGPE in the eastern region, followed by the central and western regions.…”