1997
DOI: 10.1006/jjie.1996.0351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Estimation of the Lock-In Effect of Capital Gains Taxation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capital gains tax is also likely to be responsible for under-utilisation of land through two channels. First, frequent changes in tax rates might discourage the disposal of land (Table 9) (Yamazaki and Idee, 1997). Second, the structure of the tax schedule encourages long-term holding since the rate comes down in steps as the holding period increases, leaving long-term gains taxed at only half the rate applied to short-term gains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The capital gains tax is also likely to be responsible for under-utilisation of land through two channels. First, frequent changes in tax rates might discourage the disposal of land (Table 9) (Yamazaki and Idee, 1997). Second, the structure of the tax schedule encourages long-term holding since the rate comes down in steps as the holding period increases, leaving long-term gains taxed at only half the rate applied to short-term gains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the extra corporate tax on short-term capital gains on land was eliminated in FY 1998, the tax rates for individual transactions still provide an incentive to long-term holding. Yamazaki and Idee (1997) examined the effects of capital gains taxes on the transfer of agricultural land to other uses and found lock-in effects only in rural prefectures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%