Discipline-specific library instruction has been embedded in our first-year general biology laboratory course since 2006. In 2009 students in advanced biology courses completed a survey that assessed their proficiency at using the library resources. We found that those who took the discipline-specific library instruction were more confident in their library skills, had a more scholarly approach toward biology library research, made better library database choices, and were better able to meet the expectations of their professors. The results also indicate that the first-year skills need to be reviewed and scaffolded in upper-level courses.
INTRODUCTIONThe National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT) (2008) recently issued guidelines for evaluating undergraduate programs in biology. As part of those evaluation criteria requirements for biology curriculums, NABT states the need for students to learn how to do library research. The importance of information literacy for science and engineering students is also recognized by 255 the National Research Council (2003) report of proposals to improve undergraduate training of future researchers in biology underscores the value of learning library research skills. Logically, an ideal time to initiate good research skills is early in a career. First-year biology students need to begin learning how to find and evaluate information so they can adequately utilize it when researching topics of interest in their biology courses. They should expand their initial skills throughout later courses. These lifelong library research skills help students through undergraduate and graduate programs and in their professional careers.
LITERATURE REVIEWSubject-specific information literacy and its integration into curricula, especially in the sciences, benefit students (Manuel 2004;Manuel, Beck, and Molloy 2005). Discipline-specific library instruction is part of biology education in many colleges and universities. Among the trends reported by Sinn (1998) in her literature review of library instruction for biology were that most classes were one-shot sessions, mainly covering the library online catalog and Biological Abstracts, with collaboration between biologists and librarians, and without student testing or assessment of the instruction. With the onset of the new millennium, assessment for improving information literacy became paramount. In addition, many different approaches to delivering library instruction are in use now. Collaboration between biology faculty and librarians continues to be viewed as essential for information literacy to be successful.Researchers reported different methods and findings for assessment of library instruction in biology. Spackman (2007) used focus groups to assess biology library instruction at her institution. She found that students have poor library research skills; teaching assistants do not have the time or proficiency to teach these skills; and collaboration is vital. Dinkelman (2010) analyzed biology syllabi at her institution and found that mos...