An evaluation and education program for driving while intoxicated offenders

Kruzich, David J.; Silsby, Harry D.; Gold, J. D.; Hawkins, M. R. S.

doi:10.1016/0740-5472(86)90038-3

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…36 This study showed that fully 90% of DWI offenders had a serious alcohol problem. Of this group, which represents all military personnel arrested for DWI either on or off post in the Ft. Bliss area from January 1985 to September 1989, 45% were diagnosed as alcohol dependent (alcoholic), 45% as alcohol abusers, and only 10% revealed no pattern of alcohol abuse, as shown in Figure 7.…”

Section: Arrest For Dwimentioning

confidence: 80%

Alcohol Use and Abuse: Background Information for Security Personnel

Heuer¹

1991

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Arrest For Dwimentioning

confidence: 80%

Alcohol Use and Abuse: Background Information for Security Personnel

Heuer¹

1991

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This, however, may be inappropriate. A pilot study of a DUI program at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas in 1984 found that 88% of soldiers apprehended for a DUI met criteria for either alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse (35). If this finding is generalizable to the entire Army population, it raises questions about the adequacy of screening and intervention for soldiers referred for evaluation after a DUI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Descriptive Study of US Army Soldiers Referred to, Evaluated by and Enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program, 1988-2003

Hollander¹,

Bell²,

Phillips³

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

show abstract

“…Some reviewers indicated that this should be only done after two or more incidents while others favored a single incident when there was an arrest by authorities. Research data indicate that in some studies of individuals arrested for DUIs (and where a formal alcohol dependence evaluation was conducted for each person), approximately 90 percent of these drivers were found to be either alcohol dependent or alcohol abusers (Crancer, 1986;Kruzich, Silsby, Gold & Hawkins, 1986). This suggests that a single incident DUI is strongly predictive of other serious alcohol problems.…”

Section: Alcohol Abuse/alcoholism Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adjudicative Guidelines for Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, and Mental/ Emotional Disorders. Revision

Bosshardt¹,

Crawford²

1992

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report documents the results of a review by subject matter experts of the Departmen of Defense (DoD) adjudicative guidelines for alcohol abuse, drug abuse, and mental/ emotional disorders. These guideiines are used as standards for determining eligibility for a DoD security clearance when personnel security investigations uncover adverse information in these areas. The objective of the project was to develop guidelines consistent with current scientific research and medical practice. Based on input from subject matter experts via questionnaires and workshops, recommended revisions to these criteria were generated. In addition, key differences were identified between the recommended and current guidelines as well as critical issues related to the revisions in each adjudicative area.

show abstract

An evaluation and education program for driving while intoxicated offenders

Cited by 9 publications

References 15 publications

Alcohol Use and Abuse: Background Information for Security Personnel

Alcohol Use and Abuse: Background Information for Security Personnel

A Descriptive Study of US Army Soldiers Referred to, Evaluated by and Enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program, 1988-2003

Adjudicative Guidelines for Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, and Mental/ Emotional Disorders. Revision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About