2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation model for children’s foot & ankle deformity severity using sparse multi-objective feature selection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we present a set of grading rules for assessing the severity of deformities. Additionally, Author 50 utilise a 3D foot scanner to gather data on 30-foot structure indexes. In this study, we present a novel sparse multi-objective evolutionary algorithm designed for the purpose of feature selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we present a set of grading rules for assessing the severity of deformities. Additionally, Author 50 utilise a 3D foot scanner to gather data on 30-foot structure indexes. In this study, we present a novel sparse multi-objective evolutionary algorithm designed for the purpose of feature selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, shape, texture, and color analysis help separate images from massive databases based on the images queried. As a result, the current study aims to find the best method for calculating features in a 2 2021 Deep neural network 98.6% Accuracy Shayari et al 3 2021 Bayesian optimization 97.37% Accuracy Ayadi et al 4 2021 CNN network with 98% Accuracy Barzegar and Jamzad 5 2021 BRATS datasets including high-and low-grade glioma brain tumors, KNN: 86.32%, Naïve Bays: 60.46%, Bashir-Gonbadi and Khotan Lou 6 2021 IXI and BraTS 2017 datasets, used for proposed work and to classify Brain Tumor Naïve Bays: 86% Jena et al 7 2022 Classification accuracy of 94.25%, 87.88%, 89.57%, 96.99%, and 97% with SVM, KNN, BDT, RF Jiang et al 8 2021 Edge extraction algorithm for providing edge labels with Accuracy: 96.55% Kadry et al 9 2021 Modified Moth-Flame Optimization algorithm with 83.4% Kokkalla et al 10 2021 ResNet v2 with a deep, dense network and a soft-max layer with an accuracy of 99.69% Qiaosen et al 48 2022 Automated detection of gastrointestinal diseases using wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) images with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with accuracy rate of 94.8% Jiancun et al 49 2022 Enhance the accuracy of skin disorder identification by studying the impact of color-based background selection on deep learning models' capacity to learn attributes of foreground lesions in skin disease classification with accuracy Xiaotian et al 50 2022 Develop a model for children's foot & ankle deformity using data mining and machine learning, including grading rules for deformity severity and 3D foot structure index data and achieve the accuracy of 98% Jiaze et al 51 2021…”
Section: Domain Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, evolutionary methods and MAs have been widely used in topology optimization 52 , image segmentation 53 , feature selection 54 , engineering design 55 , dispatch problem 56 , intrusion detection 57 , and many other fields. For these complex optimization problems, MAs have shown remarkable results in their applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%