Quadratic isoparametric elements with the mid-side nodes placed at the quarter position have been employed [1,2,3] for obtaining stress intensity factors K I for elastic crack problems.Several aspects of these elements that were not discussed in those studies are treated here.The displacements along the edge containing the quarter position node indicated in Figs. la and ib are given by u = u A + (-3u A + 4u B -Uc)~(r/L ) + (2u A -4u B +2UC)r/L where UA, UB, and u C are the displacements at the nodes A, B, and C respectively.The origin of the x-y and the r-@ coordinate systems is located at the tip of the crack. For Mode I loading, a situation frequently employed to assess the accuracy of various near-tip modeling schemes, the "opening" displacement along the edge ABC is simplyIt may be noted that the coefficient of the /(r/L) term contains the difference of the nodal displacements u B and u C. To be consistent with the interpolating function, the complete coefficient of /(r/L) must be employed when the crack opening profile is used for evaluating K I. Williams's eigenfunction expansion [4] along the edge ABC gives u = KI{(~ + l)/[2G/(2~)]}/r + 0(r)[2)where G is the shear modulus and K = (3 -4n) for plane strain and (3 -n)/(l + ~) for plane stress. From (i) and (2),This aspect of the determination of K I with quadratic isoparametric elements was ignored in [2]. Instead, the following formula, which contains a single nodal displacement, was employed to arrive at KI,It should be noted that (3) and (4) are equivalent only if u c = 2u B (S)In Refs. [1,3] K I is determined by extrapolating a displacement parameter, associated with the crack opening profile, to the crack tip. The displacement parameter is computed from a relationship similar to eq (4).
Int Journ of Fracture 12 (1976)
648Our numerical results indicate that L must be less than 5% of the crack length for (5) to be approximately satisfied. Therefore, computation of K I using (4) must be restricted to near-tip modeling with a fine mesh to avoid significant errors.Such a restriction on the size of the element limits the development of the full potential of these singular elements. Furthermore, eq (5) is definitely not valid where there are rigid body translation and/or rotation and thermal strains at the neartip.While both the eight-noded quadrilateral and the "degenerate" sixnoded triangular element possess the /r term throughout the element [5,6], our investigation shows that the circumferential variation of the displacements is inadequately modeled by the quadrilateral configuration shown in Fig. la. The triangular configuration shown in Fig. ib, however, proved to be very accurate. The reasons for examining these two near-tip element configurations are obvious; they are the simplest element models for crack extension studies. A double edge-cracked panel, with the element modeling shown in Fig. Ib, is examined in detail.* The J-integral [7] is evaluated along the paths indicated. The maximum difference between J associated with different paths is less than...