2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2017.8190701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of a research experience for teachers in nanotechnology

Abstract: This study involves the evaluation of the second implementation of a Research Experiences for Teacher Advancement In Nanotechnology (RETAIN) program offered at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). RETAIN represents a professional development model for providing high school teachers with laboratory research experiences in nanoscience and related content areas. In this intensive summer program, teachers spend six weeks conducting nanotechnology-related research in an IUPUI lab. As part of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method in determining a successful RET program's impact was by focusing on teacher classroom implementation's long-term impact. Most RET programs utilize immediate post-program teacher focus groups and surveys, distributed through external evaluators, to evaluate participants' content implementation plans, engineering knowledge, cultural responsiveness, and beliefs of various teaching methodologies [6,7,8,9]. Additionally, holding focus groups and distributing qualitative surveys to former participants of RETs can be utilized to measure the long-term program impact on teacher engineering knowledge [10].…”
Section: Measuring Program's Impact On Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method in determining a successful RET program's impact was by focusing on teacher classroom implementation's long-term impact. Most RET programs utilize immediate post-program teacher focus groups and surveys, distributed through external evaluators, to evaluate participants' content implementation plans, engineering knowledge, cultural responsiveness, and beliefs of various teaching methodologies [6,7,8,9]. Additionally, holding focus groups and distributing qualitative surveys to former participants of RETs can be utilized to measure the long-term program impact on teacher engineering knowledge [10].…”
Section: Measuring Program's Impact On Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%