Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1839707.1839713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of approaches to federated query processing over linked data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of our evaluation is to show first that we can handle SPARQL queries that comply with the federated extension, and second that the optimization techniques proposed in Section 4.1 actually reduce the time needed to process queries. We have checked for existing SPARQL benchmarks like the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark [4], SP 2 Bench [16] and the benchmark proposed in [7]. Unfortunately for our purposes, the first two are not designed for a distributed environment, while the third one is based on a federated scenario but is not as comprehensive as the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark and SP 2 Bench.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective of our evaluation is to show first that we can handle SPARQL queries that comply with the federated extension, and second that the optimization techniques proposed in Section 4.1 actually reduce the time needed to process queries. We have checked for existing SPARQL benchmarks like the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark [4], SP 2 Bench [16] and the benchmark proposed in [7]. Unfortunately for our purposes, the first two are not designed for a distributed environment, while the third one is based on a federated scenario but is not as comprehensive as the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark and SP 2 Bench.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately for our purposes, the first two are not designed for a distributed environment, while the third one is based on a federated scenario but is not as comprehensive as the Berlin SPARQL Benchmark and SP 2 Bench. Thus, we decided to base our evaluation on some queries from the life sciences domain, similar to those in [7] but using a base query and increasing its complexity like in [4]. These queries are real queries used by Bio2RDF experts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many queries proposed in [6] a performance gain of more than 90% can be achieved resulting in improvements of an order of magnitude, timeouts do not occur any longer. This is in particular due to the improved join order and the other above mentioned optimizations.…”
Section: Fedx -Design and System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical terms the Sesame framework in conjunction with AliBaba 1 is one possible sample solution allowing for federations of distributed repositories and endpoints. However, benchmarks have shown poor performance for many queries in the federated setup due to the absence of advanced optimization techniques [6]. From the research community DARQ [9] and Networked Graphs [10] contribute approaches to federated SPARQL queries and federated integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only work addressing the latter issue was our previous work in [13], which -focusing on selected federation approachesserved as a starting point for designing FedBench. Going far beyond this initial work, in this paper we present a holistic benchmark suite, including a variety of new data and query sets, new scenarios such as Linked Data access (i.e., via HTTP requests), an automated evaluation framework (with support for various metrics like counting the number of requests, automated evaluation, interfaces for connecting new systems etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%