2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of catchment-scale phosphorus mitigation using load apportionment modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). These results are comparable with previous LAM applications (Bowes et al, 2008(Bowes et al, , 2009a(Bowes et al, , 2009b(Bowes et al, , 2010(Bowes et al, , 2014Greene et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2013), as well as SWAT, AGNPS, HSPF and INCA-P applications [reviewed by Moriasi et al (2007) and Jackson-Blake et al (2015)], where NS N 0.20 and R 2 N 0.20 for daily TP concentration simulation results were considered acceptable for NPS pollution dominated watersheds. Monthly and annual riverine TP loads estimated by the LAM were further compared to those obtained with the LOADEST model (Supplementary material: Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of Phosphorus-water Discharge Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). These results are comparable with previous LAM applications (Bowes et al, 2008(Bowes et al, , 2009a(Bowes et al, , 2009b(Bowes et al, , 2010(Bowes et al, , 2014Greene et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2013), as well as SWAT, AGNPS, HSPF and INCA-P applications [reviewed by Moriasi et al (2007) and Jackson-Blake et al (2015)], where NS N 0.20 and R 2 N 0.20 for daily TP concentration simulation results were considered acceptable for NPS pollution dominated watersheds. Monthly and annual riverine TP loads estimated by the LAM were further compared to those obtained with the LOADEST model (Supplementary material: Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of Phosphorus-water Discharge Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Based on the fundamental hydrological differences between nutrient inputs from PS and NPS to rivers, a load apportionment model (LAM) may be developed for statistically quantifying point and nonpoint source nutrient inputs as a power-law function of river discharge (Bowes et al, 2008(Bowes et al, , 2009a(Bowes et al, , 2009b(Bowes et al, , 2010(Bowes et al, , 2014Greene et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2013). The LAM does not require detailed watershed attribute information and can potentially be applied to any dataset comprised of paired P concentrations and river discharge measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the input data is the same (paired nutrient concentration and flow data), the two approaches are subtly different. Nutrient concentration-flow relationships (usually at weekly temporal resolution) have been used in previous studies to infer the relative nutrient contributions to the river from constant and rain-related inputs , using the Load Apportionment Modelling approach (Bowes et al, 2008;Bowes et al, 2009a;Chen et al, 2013;Greene et al, 2011;Jarvie et al, 2012;Jarvie et al, 2010). A river dominated by constant nutrient inputs (largely equivalent to STW effluent inputs in the UK) will form a dilution curve with negative gradient as flow increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This monitoring is often spatially rich in terms of river network coverage but temporally poor and, as storm driven diffuse P transfers from agricultural land tend to form very significant contributions Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 3094 P. Jordan and R. Cassidy: Assessing a 24/7 solution for monitoring water quality loads to annual loads in rivers (Greene et al, 2011), low frequency monitoring may be insufficient to monitor these transfers. This has potentially serious implications as competent authorities are charged with implementing agricultural mitigation measures within legislation and monitoring the benefits at catchment scale (Mainstone et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%