2012
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of cellulose saccharification and fermentation with an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of cellobiose and xylose utilization

Abstract: Commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol production has been hindered by high costs associated with cellulose-to-glucose conversion and hexose and pentose co-fermentation. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with a yeast strain capable of xylose and cellobiose co-utilization has been proposed as a possible avenue to reduce these costs. The recently developed DA24-16 strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae incorporates a xylose assimilation pathway and a cellodextrin transporter (CDT) that permit rapid g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fox et al [4] simulated various SSF and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) conditions with a large number of empirical parameters. Using an extremely high Monod constant (K cellobiose = 350 mM, ~120 g cellobiose/L) for growth on cellobiose and a low starting inoculum of yeast cells (OD600 ~1.0), the model predicted that the co-fermenting strain of yeast produces ethanol more slowly from a mixture of cellulose and xylose than a control case where β-glucosidase was added extracellularly to a strain exhibiting the same glucose and xylose fermenting capability (Fig.…”
Section: Btj-commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fox et al [4] simulated various SSF and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) conditions with a large number of empirical parameters. Using an extremely high Monod constant (K cellobiose = 350 mM, ~120 g cellobiose/L) for growth on cellobiose and a low starting inoculum of yeast cells (OD600 ~1.0), the model predicted that the co-fermenting strain of yeast produces ethanol more slowly from a mixture of cellulose and xylose than a control case where β-glucosidase was added extracellularly to a strain exhibiting the same glucose and xylose fermenting capability (Fig.…”
Section: Btj-commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for co-fermenting strains that utilize intracellular β-glucosidase to be competitive, it will be necessary to reduce the Monod constant for growth on cellobiose. While the mechanistic model-based predictions of Fox et al [4] provide a quantitative means for understanding the dynamics of cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation in SSF scenarios and for improving yeast strains for commercial processes, there are always difficulties in extrapolating from the near ideal conditions used to derive the empirical parameters to the unknowns in a heterogeneous (solid/ liquid) and multi-component (cellulose, cellobiose, enzymes, yeast cells, and ethanol) system. For example, cellulases likely do not behave as modeled in high cellulose loadings (>10% weight/volume) due to unknown mechanisms that result in lower hydrolysis yields [5].…”
Section: Btj-commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Esta estratégia reduz o potencial de contaminação microbiológica, diminui os custos de equipamento e previne a ação enzimática de ser inibida pelos açúcares produzidos, aumentando assim o rendimento desta etapa (Fox et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified