SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/980032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of CFD for Modelling the Flow Around Stationary and Rotating Isolated Wheels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure distribution on the whole surface of the wheel is validated via its integral leading to drag and lift coefficients. For the stationary wheel, the measured drag and lift coefficients were in the range C D = 0.76 ± 15% and C L = 0.77 ± 15% (Fackrell and Harvey, 1973;Skea et al, 1998;Mears et al, 2002;Axon et al, 1998), respectively, where the extent of the range of coefficients indicates the difference between the measurement results of the previously mentioned publications. For the rotating wheel, the same properties were typically C D = 0.58 ± 15% and C L = 0.44 ± 15% (Fackrell and Harvey, 1973;Skea et al, 1998;Mears et al, 2002;Axon et al, 1998).…”
Section: Validation Of Integral Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The pressure distribution on the whole surface of the wheel is validated via its integral leading to drag and lift coefficients. For the stationary wheel, the measured drag and lift coefficients were in the range C D = 0.76 ± 15% and C L = 0.77 ± 15% (Fackrell and Harvey, 1973;Skea et al, 1998;Mears et al, 2002;Axon et al, 1998), respectively, where the extent of the range of coefficients indicates the difference between the measurement results of the previously mentioned publications. For the rotating wheel, the same properties were typically C D = 0.58 ± 15% and C L = 0.44 ± 15% (Fackrell and Harvey, 1973;Skea et al, 1998;Mears et al, 2002;Axon et al, 1998).…”
Section: Validation Of Integral Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The model was developed using Ansys design modeler V 14.5 and Figure 3 shows the details of the dry wheel model used such as the tyre and its grooves dimensions. The boundary of the flow volume surrounding the tire is set according to the recommended dimension ratios in literatures [11,12]. The length in front of the tire is taken to be 5D and equal to the lengths of both sides and of the top [13].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was only proposed theoretically by Fackrell [5] in a non-approved manner. The next was Van Den Berg [9][10][11][12][13] whose work focused on investigating the aerodynamic interaction between the rotating wheel and the front inverted wing. Although his measuring arrangement was similar to that used by Fackrell, he didn't rely on the data collected by Mears which successfully captured the suction peak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beneath the vehicle, a no-slip, moving ground plane boundary condition is prescribed at a velocity of U g and a yaw angle of 6.1 • . The no-slip surfaces of the tractor and trailer tires, which rotate at an angular velocity of 53s −1 , intersect the ground plane, producing a tire contact patch that has a swept angle of 20 • [2]. A slip boundary condition and a zero gradient boundary condition are specified along the walls and outlet, respectively, of the computational domain.…”
Section: Cfd Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%