2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2016.7822644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of data replication for bioinformatics workflows on NoSQL systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors gave a profound explanation and description of the two used models of replication: Master/ slave and replica-set models. An interesting study (Lima et al, 2016) has been conducted to evaluate the impact of biological data replication on MongoDB and Cassandra. Some setting in the cluster and replication factors can certainly affect the results.…”
Section: Results Analysis Of the Proposed Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors gave a profound explanation and description of the two used models of replication: Master/ slave and replica-set models. An interesting study (Lima et al, 2016) has been conducted to evaluate the impact of biological data replication on MongoDB and Cassandra. Some setting in the cluster and replication factors can certainly affect the results.…”
Section: Results Analysis Of the Proposed Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works have focused their attention on the improvement of auto-sharding, load balance, and auto-scaling algorithms, e.g., (Liu et al, 2012;Gu et al, 2015;Mohamed, 2015). Other works analyse the differences of Mongo's data model, query and replication model with relational database management systems, e.g., (Lima et al, 2016;Mansouri and Asadi, 2014). Many of these works are trying to take a closer look to performance by comparing capabilities of MongoDB with other NoSQL systems, e.g., performance comparison between MongoDB and Cassandra in (Haughian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introduced an innovative method for data replication in data grid systems, with an emphasis on enhancing resource allocation while taking economic considerations into account. [5] Li. T et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This functionality ensures that the secondary nodes stay synchronized and uphold data consistency with the primary node. [2][4] [5] [8] The Oplog is structured as a capped collection, which implies that it has a predefined size limit. When the Oplog reaches this limit, it automatically deletes older entries to free up space for storing new entries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is known as cloud bursting and makes a secure connection between a private cloud and a public cloud, where the private and public clouds we respectively call consumer and donor. When a data-intensive application running on a private cloud and requiring a resource (e.g., a VM instance) the application provider subscribes to a public cloud and creates it in the public cloud using either automation tools such as Terraform Ansible 15 , or APIs provided by the public cloud. After that, the private cloud makes a connection with the public cloud through WireGuard.…”
Section: On-demand Usage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%