1983
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of dental pain using Visual Analogue Scales and the McGill Pain Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional approaches to pain measurement include numeric and verbal self-rating scales, behavioral observation scales, questionnaires, and psychological responses (12). Pain scales primarily have two roles, which are to measure the severity of pain and to determine if a patient's pain has changed (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional approaches to pain measurement include numeric and verbal self-rating scales, behavioral observation scales, questionnaires, and psychological responses (12). Pain scales primarily have two roles, which are to measure the severity of pain and to determine if a patient's pain has changed (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of visual analog scales for measurement of acute pain has been established in previous studies (Seymour et al 1983;Breivik et al 2000;Bijur et al 2001;Gallagher et al 2002).…”
Section: Visual Analog Scale Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS, for which patients are asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their opinion, has been shown to be a valid, reliable, and reproducible instrument to measure patient satisfaction in clinical studies. 34,35 The VAS evaluation revealed that patients were more satisfied with their non-submerged implants than with their submerged implants for all aspects. While some questions such as those on aesthetic satisfaction and cleaning or chewing ability appear non-relevant to the surgical technique, the higher patient satisfaction for non-submerged implants may reflect the significant advantages of the one-stage implant insertion technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%