2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03173675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of elementary school science kits in terms of classroom environment and student attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears important to overcome disgust triggered by a dissection activity before hoping that it might improve I/M/A [89]. 'Science kits' are sometimes able to improve I/M/A [93]. Teaching for conceptual change does not necessarily improve I/M/A [38], although another recent research study has reported the opposite: situational interest might be more powerful than cognitive conflict to favour conceptual change (Kang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Other Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears important to overcome disgust triggered by a dissection activity before hoping that it might improve I/M/A [89]. 'Science kits' are sometimes able to improve I/M/A [93]. Teaching for conceptual change does not necessarily improve I/M/A [38], although another recent research study has reported the opposite: situational interest might be more powerful than cognitive conflict to favour conceptual change (Kang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Other Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to existing literature, findings on kit-based science instruction as reported by the participants in this study are consistent with the positive impact on student attitudes toward science (Kelly & Staver, 2005;Houston et al, 2008) and an overall satisfaction with the classroom environment (Houston et al, 2008).…”
Section: Hands-on Learningsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The findings of this study support existing literature on kit-based programming in that they have shown to have a positive impact on student attitudes toward science (Kelly & Staver, 2005;Houston et al, 2008) and provide teachers with tools to enhance science learning (Robardey et al, 1994;Slavin et al, 2014). The limitations of this study do not allow for findings to support existing literature on the positive impact on student achievement (Young & Lee, 2005;Dickerson et al, 2006) because there was no required assessment component to the pilot and the participants did not generally speak to measured academic performance.…”
Section: Hands-on Learningmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations