An evaluation of environmental factors affecting species distributions

Abstract

Many different models can be built to explain the distributions of species. Often there is no single model that is clearly better than the alternatives, and this leads to uncertainty over which environmental factors are limiting species' distributions. We investigated the support for different environmental factors by determining the drop in model performance when selected predictors were excluded from the model building process. We used a paired t-test over 37 plant species so that an environmental factor was only deemed significant if it consistently improved the results for multiple species. Geology and winter minimum temperatures were found to be the environmental factors with the most support, with a significant drop in model performance when either of these factors was excluded. However, there was less support for summer maximum temperature, as other environmental factors could combine to produce similar model performance. Our method of evaluating environmental factors using multiple species will not be capable of detecting predictors that are only important for one or two species, but it is difficult to distinguish these from spurious correlations. The strength of the method is that it increases inference for factors that consistently affect the distributions of many species. We discourage the assessment of models against predefined benchmarks, such as an area under the curve (AUC) of more than 0.7, as many alternative models for the same species produce similar results. Therefore, the benchmarks do not provide any indication of how the performance of the selected model compares to alternative models, and they provide weak inference to accept any selected model. distributions. We investigated the support for different environmental factors by determining the drop in model performance when selected predictors were excluded from the model building process. We used a paired t-test over 37 plant species so that an environmental factor was only deemed significant if it consistently improved the results for multiple species. Geology and winter minimum temperatures were found to be the environmental factors with the most support, with a significant drop in model performance when either of these factors was excluded. However, there was less support for summer maximum temperature, as other environmental factors could combine to produce similar model performance. Our method of evaluating environmental factors using multiple species will not be capable of detecting predictors that are only important for one or two species, but it is difficult to distinguish these from spurious correlations. The strength of the method is that it increases inference for factors that consistently affect the distributions of many species. We discourage the assessment of models against predefined benchmarks, such as an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of more than 0.7, as many alternative models for the same species produce similar results. Therefore, the benchmarks do not provide any indication of how the performance of the selected ...

Potential, realised, future distribution and environmental suitability for Pterocarpus angolensis DC in southern Africa

“…Currently, the choice of predictors remains a challenge (Ashcroft et al, 2011) and it is remarkable that a lot of studies do not use an objective selection method (Acevedo et al, 2012;Elith and Leathwick, 2009;Elith et al, 2006;Phillips et al, 2006;Thuiller et al, 2006;Zimmermann et al, 2009) Early test runs of the models indicated that validation results also improved when both training and test points in Namibia and South Africa -that had a relative overrepresentation of occurrences and thus induced a bias in the data -were reduced. However, when only the training points were reduced, the model performed worse because of the bias in the test points.…”

Predicting the potential distribution area of Solidago ×niederederi (Asteraceae)

“…Focusing on the jackknife test results, we would like to emphasize that two environmental variables, namely mean temperature of wettest quarter and precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation), were also revealed by the MAXENT model as the most important factors in determining the potential distribution of S. canadensis in China (Xu et al, 2014). Moreover, the strong influence of the minimum temperature of coldest month on S. ×niederederi occurrence in Central and East Europe confirms the known regularity in plant species distribution (Woodward and Williams, 1987;Ashcroft et al, 2010). The above-mentioned variables, as well as annual temperature range, precipitation of warmest quarter, and precipitation of coldest quarter, indicate favorable conditions for plant growth and photosynthesis (Xu et al, 2014).…”

The Impact of Environmental Factors on Distribution of Ferula Ovina (Boiss.) Boiss. In Northwest Iran

“…Environmental variables affect the distribution of plant species (Ashcroft et al, 2011). Therefore, identification of effective variables on spatial distributions of plant communities is an essential issue in ecology (Araujo and Guisan, 2006;Bagheri et al, 2017).…”