Day 2 Thu, February 16, 2017 2017
DOI: 10.2118/185028-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of EOR Potential in the Elm Coulee Bakken Formation, Richland County, Montana

Abstract: Low primary recovery percentages from unconventional reservoirs have long motivated interest in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) for these reservoirs, resulting in numerous simulation studies and injection pilots. However, performance from injections pilots has typically been disappointing compared to the simulations, suggesting that reservoir permeability and heterogeneity are not adequately described in the reservoir simulation models. In this study, a simulation and history-matching approach was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the porosity, ∅ gb , used in the fracture gridblocks was 0.00005 (0.005%) resulting in a 50 ft gridblock representing a 1/8-inch fracture. Pressure-dependent permeability is often used to simulate changes in permeability resulting from pressure depletion in unconventional reservoirs [7,[27][28][29]. This accounts for the micro and meso fractures (less than 50 ft) in the reservoir that close and reduce permeability as pressure is reduced.…”
Section: Single-well Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the porosity, ∅ gb , used in the fracture gridblocks was 0.00005 (0.005%) resulting in a 50 ft gridblock representing a 1/8-inch fracture. Pressure-dependent permeability is often used to simulate changes in permeability resulting from pressure depletion in unconventional reservoirs [7,[27][28][29]. This accounts for the micro and meso fractures (less than 50 ft) in the reservoir that close and reduce permeability as pressure is reduced.…”
Section: Single-well Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes CO 2 the best candidate for improving the tight oil recovery . Several studies report that it can achieve an incremental oil recovery in the range of 5%‐20% in the Bakken and Eagle ford reservoirs using the huff‐n‐puff gas process . However, some studies also indicate that CO 2 injection does have several drawbacks, including the rapid decline of oil production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[15][16][17][18] Several studies report that it can achieve an incremental oil recovery in the range of 5%-20% in the Bakken and Eagle ford reservoirs using the huff-n-puff gas process. [19][20][21][22][23] However, some studies also indicate that CO 2 injection does have several drawbacks, 24,25 including the rapid decline of oil production. Some have reported that the reservoir pressure during production cycle sharply drops after the first cycle with linear depletion to the minimum pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%