2019
DOI: 10.15376/biores.14.3.6433-6446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of fiber biometry and nanomechanical properties of different Eucalyptus species

Abstract: Wood fibers from seven Eucalyptus species were collected to investigate the relationships among species, fiber biometry, and nanomechanical properties. The results indicated significant differences in wood density, coarseness, fiber length, fiber width, and cell wall thickness among the different Eucalyptus species. The nanomechanical properties of the S2 cell wall layer also showed significant differences among the Eucalyptus species. The elasticity modulus ranged from 16 to 19 GPa, the hardness spanned 0.24 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macerated plant fragments from L. pyrotechnica were studied on microscopic slides and examined by a full automatic Olympus microscope (Figure 4). The basic biometry that affected the physical properties of fibers for the paper industry is fiber dimensions including fiber length, fiber width, and fiber cell wall thickness [60]. The basic dimensions of L. pyrotechnica and their comparison with some annual fiber-producing plants are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Biometry Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macerated plant fragments from L. pyrotechnica were studied on microscopic slides and examined by a full automatic Olympus microscope (Figure 4). The basic biometry that affected the physical properties of fibers for the paper industry is fiber dimensions including fiber length, fiber width, and fiber cell wall thickness [60]. The basic dimensions of L. pyrotechnica and their comparison with some annual fiber-producing plants are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Biometry Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%