2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1839929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Impeller Blade Torque During an Impeller–Diffuser Interaction

Abstract: An evaluation of the torque on an impeller blade interacting with a diffuser blade is presented. Comparisons of time averaged quantities are made between computed and measured results. The calculation of the impeller blade torque was based on the axial moment from fluid forces acting on a control volume surrounding an impeller blade passage. Unsteady flow field contributions were incorporated in the computational model. Results are compared to numerical predictions of the impeller blade torque based on pressur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard κ-ε is generally chosen as the turbulence closure model. Some of the authors (e.g., [4,13]) compared the predictions of several two-equation turbulence models and obtained the better accuracy using the standard version of either the κ-ε or κ-ω closure.…”
Section: Ref and Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The standard κ-ε is generally chosen as the turbulence closure model. Some of the authors (e.g., [4,13]) compared the predictions of several two-equation turbulence models and obtained the better accuracy using the standard version of either the κ-ε or κ-ω closure.…”
Section: Ref and Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be confirmed by the poor accuracies achieved by the calculations results presented in [3], which however also pay for the still limited development level of the CFD packages available at that time. In fact, the other single-stage single-channel calculations provided results for either some flow unsteadiness [4] or correction for the interaction between stages [14], and the obtained accuracy of the global performance prediction was not worse than that achieved by the other more complex and computationally expensive models summarised in the table.…”
Section: Ref and Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations