1990
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(90)90147-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of low-energy feedstuffs in diets for laying hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, shell thickness significantly increased in eggs laid by hens fed diet with 2800 kcal/kg ME, 0.40% M and supplemented with 20 mg FA/kg as compared to other treatments (Table 4). These findings agree with those reported by Omara et al (2009) and Stilborn and Waldroup (1990), who reported that dietary energy level did not significantly influenced Haugh units values. Haugh units were not influenced significantly by energy and folic acid levels up to 3000 kcal ME/kg and 6 mg/kg, respectively, but influenced by M level up to 0.50% and the effect of interaction among ME, M and FA on Haugh unit was significant (El-Husseiny et al 2005).…”
Section: Egg Qualitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, shell thickness significantly increased in eggs laid by hens fed diet with 2800 kcal/kg ME, 0.40% M and supplemented with 20 mg FA/kg as compared to other treatments (Table 4). These findings agree with those reported by Omara et al (2009) and Stilborn and Waldroup (1990), who reported that dietary energy level did not significantly influenced Haugh units values. Haugh units were not influenced significantly by energy and folic acid levels up to 3000 kcal ME/kg and 6 mg/kg, respectively, but influenced by M level up to 0.50% and the effect of interaction among ME, M and FA on Haugh unit was significant (El-Husseiny et al 2005).…”
Section: Egg Qualitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lower dietary energy levels tended to reduce body weight gain when hens fed diets containing a wide range of ME (2500, 2600, 2700 and 2800 kcal ME/kg). This may be attributed to less available energy for fat deposition when lower dietary ME levels are utilized resulting in reducing the amount of weight gain that occurs during the laying period (Stilborn and Waldroup, 1990). Balnave and Robinson (2000) observed that body weight gain of laying hens increased with increasing dietary ME level (2500, 2700 and 2900 kcal ME/kg) in the diet, and concluded that this result may be due to the fact that abdominal fat pad weight (as a proportion of body weight) at termination of the trial was lower for the low ME diet than for the other diets.…”
Section: Productive Performance: Body Weight and Body Weight Changementioning
confidence: 99%