2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2013.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods to Detect Malicious SCADA Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
75
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the classification problem is complex as the error rates are high. This has been confirmed previously [36], [37], where the classifiers tend to make mistakes on the rare classes. As for the online learning algorithms evaluated in this experiment, their error rates are approximately 30% in most cases, not differing significantly from those of the batch models reported in [36], [37].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Binary Datasetssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…First, the classification problem is complex as the error rates are high. This has been confirmed previously [36], [37], where the classifiers tend to make mistakes on the rare classes. As for the online learning algorithms evaluated in this experiment, their error rates are approximately 30% in most cases, not differing significantly from those of the batch models reported in [36], [37].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Binary Datasetssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The authors have demonstrated the use of classification techniques to predict the faults in advance. Beaver et al [35] compare and evaluate various machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection in SCADA communication channel. Erez and Wool [36] describe a novel domain-aware anomaly detection system that detects irregular changes in Modbus/TCP SCADA control register values.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 However, wireless technologies such as 802.11-based networks, Zigbee, and others are increasingly being deployed in these industrial control systems. This is the case for devices used in industrial control environments.…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case for devices used in industrial control environments. 24,25 However, wireless technologies such as 802.11-based networks, Zigbee, and others are increasingly being deployed in these industrial control systems. Many IoT devices are currently using Zigbee, which has low power consumption (therefore extending battery life).…”
Section: Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%